Will M. Gervais

6.8k total citations · 3 hit papers
45 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

Will M. Gervais is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Will M. Gervais has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 23 papers in Social Psychology and 18 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Will M. Gervais's work include Cultural Differences and Values (18 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (18 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers). Will M. Gervais is often cited by papers focused on Cultural Differences and Values (18 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (18 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers). Will M. Gervais collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Will M. Gervais's co-authors include Ara Norenzayan, Azim Shariff, Joseph Henrich, Aiyana K. Willard, Evan C. Carter, Felix D. Schönbrodt, Joseph Hilgard, Maxine B. Najle, Edward Slingerland and Rita Anne McNamara and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Will M. Gervais

43 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Hit Papers

The cultural evolution of prosocial religions 2012 2026 2016 2021 2014 2012 2019 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Will M. Gervais United States 27 1.9k 1.4k 1.2k 964 418 45 3.3k
Joseph Bulbulia New Zealand 33 2.2k 1.1× 2.0k 1.5× 986 0.8× 929 1.0× 623 1.5× 129 4.5k
Dimitris Xygalatas United States 28 1.4k 0.7× 1.3k 1.0× 561 0.5× 621 0.6× 480 1.1× 75 2.6k
Aiyana K. Willard United Kingdom 20 1.4k 0.7× 924 0.7× 732 0.6× 489 0.5× 293 0.7× 43 2.2k
Jesse M. Bering United States 26 1.2k 0.6× 1.1k 0.8× 617 0.5× 686 0.7× 416 1.0× 65 2.4k
Roland Imhoff Germany 31 3.5k 1.8× 1.1k 0.8× 678 0.6× 1.5k 1.6× 436 1.0× 124 4.7k
Justin L. Barrett United States 31 2.5k 1.3× 1.8k 1.3× 2.7k 2.3× 753 0.8× 395 0.9× 84 5.2k
Sam A. Hardy United States 32 1.5k 0.8× 1.5k 1.1× 717 0.6× 471 0.5× 304 0.7× 91 3.8k
Ian McGregor Canada 31 1.8k 0.9× 2.6k 1.9× 511 0.4× 875 0.9× 600 1.4× 45 4.0k
Bob Altemeyer Canada 16 2.7k 1.4× 1.7k 1.2× 1.0k 0.9× 395 0.4× 149 0.4× 21 3.5k
Claudia Dalbert Germany 32 2.2k 1.1× 2.4k 1.8× 417 0.4× 670 0.7× 370 0.9× 91 4.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Will M. Gervais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Will M. Gervais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Will M. Gervais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Will M. Gervais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Will M. Gervais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Will M. Gervais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Will M. Gervais. The network helps show where Will M. Gervais may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Will M. Gervais

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Will M. Gervais. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Will M. Gervais based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Will M. Gervais. Will M. Gervais is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gervais, Will M., Ryan McKay, Jazmin L. Brown‐Iannuzzi, et al.. (2025). Belief in belief: Even atheists in secular countries show intuitive preferences favoring religious belief. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 122(13). e2404720122–e2404720122. 1 indexed citations
2.
McKay, Ryan, Will M. Gervais, & Colin J. Davis. (2023). ‘So Help Me God’? Does oath swearing in courtroom scenarios impact trial outcomes?. British Journal of Psychology. 114(4). 991–1014.
3.
Gervais, Will M., Maxine B. Najle, & Nava Caluori. (2021). The Origins of Religious Disbelief: A Dual Inheritance Approach. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 12(7). 1369–1379. 26 indexed citations
4.
Gervais, Will M.. (2021). Practical Methodological Reform Needs Good Theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 16(4). 827–843. 22 indexed citations
5.
Gervais, Will M., Michiel van Elk, Dimitris Xygalatas, et al.. (2018). Analytic atheism: A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?. Judgment and Decision Making. 13(3). 268–274. 57 indexed citations
6.
Schiavone, Sarah R. & Will M. Gervais. (2017). Atheists. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 11(12). 6 indexed citations
7.
Brown‐Iannuzzi, Jazmin L., et al.. (2017). Atheist horns and religious halos: Mental representations of atheists and theists.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 147(2). 292–297. 26 indexed citations
8.
Harreveld, Frenk van, et al.. (2017). Mentalizing skills do not differentiate believers from non-believers, but credibility enhancing displays do. PLoS ONE. 12(8). e0182764–e0182764. 47 indexed citations
9.
Murray, Damian R., Nicholas Kerry, & Will M. Gervais. (2017). On Disease and Deontology: Multiple Tests of the Influence of Disease Threat on Moral Vigilance. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 10(1). 44–52. 37 indexed citations
10.
Gervais, Will M.. (2015). Override the controversy: Analytic thinking predicts endorsement of evolution. Cognition. 142. 312–321. 80 indexed citations
11.
Norenzayan, Ara, Azim Shariff, Will M. Gervais, et al.. (2014). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 39. e1–e1. 453 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Gervais, Will M.. (2014). Good for God? Religious motivation reduces perceived responsibility for and morality of good deeds.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 143(4). 1616–1626. 13 indexed citations
13.
Gervais, Will M.. (2014). Everything Is Permitted? People Intuitively Judge Immorality as Representative of Atheists. PLoS ONE. 9(4). e92302–e92302. 77 indexed citations
14.
Gervais, Will M.. (2013). In Godlessness We Distrust: Using Social Psychology to Solve the Puzzle of Anti‐atheist Prejudice. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 7(6). 366–377. 68 indexed citations
15.
Gervais, Will M.. (2013). Perceiving Minds and Gods. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 8(4). 380–394. 63 indexed citations
16.
Norenzayan, Ara & Will M. Gervais. (2012). The origins of religious disbelief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 17(1). 20–25. 159 indexed citations
17.
Norenzayan, Ara, Will M. Gervais, & Kali H. Trzesniewski. (2012). Mentalizing Deficits Constrain Belief in a Personal God. PLoS ONE. 7(5). e36880–e36880. 157 indexed citations
18.
Gervais, Will M., Azim Shariff, & Ara Norenzayan. (2011). Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 101(6). 1189–1206. 264 indexed citations
19.
Schaller, Mark, et al.. (2010). Mere Visual Perception of Other People’s Disease Symptoms Facilitates a More Aggressive Immune Response. Psychological Science. 21(5). 649–652. 152 indexed citations
20.
Gervais, Will M., et al.. (2010). Implied body action directs spatial attention. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 72(6). 1437–1443. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026