Emily Oxley
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Information Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Melissa BondNina BergdahlHassan KhosraviVioleta NegreaGeorge SiemensPhuong PhamSin Wang ChongMaarten de Laat
- Topics
- Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers)Educational and Psychological Assessments (4 papers)Language Development and Disorders (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Learning DisabilitiesReading and WritingInternational Journal of Educational Research
- Partner nations
- United KingdomDenmarkSweden
In The Last Decade
Emily Oxley
10 papers receiving 285 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Computer Science Applications 107
- Education 84
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 79
- Artificial Intelligence 68
- Information Systems 55
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Oxley
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Oxley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Oxley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Oxley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Oxley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Oxley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Oxley. The network helps show where Emily Oxley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Oxley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Oxley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Oxley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Oxley. Emily Oxley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigourbreakdown → | 208 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 21 |
About Emily Oxley
Emily Oxley is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Science Applications, having authored 11 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (4 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (55 citations), Computer Science Applications (107 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (79 citations). Emily Oxley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Melissa Bond, Nina Bergdahl, Hassan Khosravi, Violeta Negrea, George Siemens, Phuong Pham, Sin Wang Chong, Maarten de Laat, Hannah Nash and Cécile De Cat. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Learning Disabilities, Reading and Writing and International Journal of Educational Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.