Emily Goodman‐Scott
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Safety Research top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jennifer Betters‐BubonJolie Ziomek‐DaigleBlaire CholewaTim GrothausChristopher A. SinkPamelia E. BrottDanica G. HaysMichael T. Kalkbrenner
- Topics
- Counseling Practices and Supervision (38 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (19 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (15 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Counseling & DevelopmentJournal of Positive Behavior InterventionsEducational Policy
- Partner nations
- United StatesGhana
In The Last Decade
Emily Goodman‐Scott
61 papers receiving 455 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Social Psychology 313
- Clinical Psychology 262
- Education 171
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 163
- Safety Research 59
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Goodman‐Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Goodman‐Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Goodman‐Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Goodman‐Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Goodman‐Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Goodman‐Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Goodman‐Scott. The network helps show where Emily Goodman‐Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Goodman‐Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Goodman‐Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Goodman‐Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Goodman‐Scott. Emily Goodman‐Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Emily Goodman‐Scott
Emily Goodman‐Scott is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Counseling Practices and Supervision (38 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (19 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (313 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (163 citations) and Clinical Psychology (262 citations). Emily Goodman‐Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Betters‐Bubon, Jolie Ziomek‐Daigle, Blaire Cholewa, Tim Grothaus, Christopher A. Sink, Pamelia E. Brott, Danica G. Hays, Michael T. Kalkbrenner, Jennifer N. B. Cook and Ian Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Counseling & Development, Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions and Educational Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.