Emanuel de Bellis

932 total citations
21 papers, 633 citations indexed

About

Emanuel de Bellis is a scholar working on Marketing, Management of Technology and Innovation and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emanuel de Bellis has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 633 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Marketing, 6 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emanuel de Bellis's work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (8 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (6 papers) and Product Development and Customization (5 papers). Emanuel de Bellis is often cited by papers focused on Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (8 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (6 papers) and Product Development and Customization (5 papers). Emanuel de Bellis collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Austria. Emanuel de Bellis's co-authors include Gita Venkataramani Johar, Andreas Herrmann, Bernd H. Schmitt, Michael Schulte‐Mecklenbeck, Christian Hildebrand, Ralph Hertwig, Nathalie Martin, Reto Hofstetter, Matthias Sohn and Kenichi Ito and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Journal of Marketing.

In The Last Decade

Emanuel de Bellis

19 papers receiving 593 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emanuel de Bellis Switzerland	11	291	207	106	101	80	21	633
Eva Marina Reinares Lara Spain	14	233 0.8×	259 1.3×	87 0.8×	167 1.7×	85 1.1×	63	665
Yao Song China	17	240 0.8×	215 1.0×	116 1.1×	134 1.3×	183 2.3×	40	779
Yuansi Hou China	13	284 1.0×	401 1.9×	112 1.1×	69 0.7×	136 1.7×	27	716
Rubén Huertas-García Spain	15	227 0.8×	243 1.2×	98 0.9×	86 0.9×	72 0.9×	54	679
Kyle B. Murray Canada	17	486 1.7×	376 1.8×	41 0.4×	157 1.6×	150 1.9×	51	909
Eloïse Coupey United States	12	348 1.2×	296 1.4×	38 0.4×	163 1.6×	69 0.9×	33	745
Kate Letheren Australia	16	237 0.8×	260 1.3×	235 2.2×	78 0.8×	130 1.6×	35	653
Jeffrey R. Parker United States	12	409 1.4×	203 1.0×	29 0.3×	80 0.8×	80 1.0×	31	657
Ha Kyung Lee South Korea	12	312 1.1×	234 1.1×	54 0.5×	153 1.5×	73 0.9×	67	678

Countries citing papers authored by Emanuel de Bellis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emanuel de Bellis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emanuel de Bellis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emanuel de Bellis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emanuel de Bellis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emanuel de Bellis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emanuel de Bellis. The network helps show where Emanuel de Bellis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emanuel de Bellis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emanuel de Bellis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emanuel de Bellis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emanuel de Bellis. Emanuel de Bellis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Bellis, Emanuel de, et al.. (2025). AI assessment changes human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 122(25). e2425439122–e2425439122. 1 indexed citations

Hofstetter, Reto, et al.. (2023). Unveiling the Mind of the Machine. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

Bellis, Emanuel de, et al.. (2023). Meaning of Manual Labor Impedes Consumer Adoption of Autonomous Products. Journal of Marketing. 87(6). 949–965. 27 indexed citations

Hofstetter, Reto, et al.. (2023). Unveiling the Mind of the Machine. Journal of Consumer Research. 51(2). 342–361. 30 indexed citations

Hildebrand, Christian, et al.. (2023). The Power of AI-Generated Voices: How Digital Vocal Tract Length Shapes Product Congruency and Ad Performance. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 59(2). 117–134. 22 indexed citations

Bellis, Emanuel de, et al.. (2023). One-of-a-kind products: Leveraging strict uniqueness in mass customization. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 40(4). 823–840. 9 indexed citations

Hofstetter, Reto, Emanuel de Bellis, Leif Brandes, et al.. (2022). Crypto-marketing: how non-fungible tokens (NFTs) challenge traditional marketing. Marketing Letters. 33(4). 705–711. 82 indexed citations

Hofstetter, Reto, Emanuel de Bellis, Leif Brandes, et al.. (2022). Crypto-Marketing: How Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) Challenge Traditional Marketing. SSRN Electronic Journal. 15 indexed citations

Schlager, Tobias, Emanuel de Bellis, & JoAndrea Hoegg. (2020). How and when weather boosts consumer product valuation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 48(4). 695–711. 10 indexed citations

10.

Bellis, Emanuel de & Gita Venkataramani Johar. (2020). Autonomous Shopping Systems: Identifying and Overcoming Barriers to Consumer Adoption. Journal of Retailing. 96(1). 74–87. 162 indexed citations

11.

Whillans, Ashley V., et al.. (2020). Robots Save Us Time—But Do They Make Us Happier?. WU Research. 1 indexed citations

12.

Bellis, Emanuel de, et al.. (2020). Smart Products Report 2020. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 1 indexed citations

13.

Gollnhofer, Johanna, et al.. (2019). Consumer Perceptions of Autonomous Shopping Systems. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 3 indexed citations

14.

Bellis, Emanuel de, Christian Hildebrand, Kenichi Ito, Andreas Herrmann, & Bernd H. Schmitt. (2019). Personalizing the Customization Experience: A Matching Theory of Mass Customization Interfaces and Cultural Information Processing. Journal of Marketing Research. 56(6). 1050–1065. 51 indexed citations

15.

Bellis, Emanuel de, et al.. (2018). Blind haste: As light decreases, speeding increases. PLoS ONE. 13(1). e0188951–e0188951. 18 indexed citations

16.

Bellis, Emanuel de, David E. Sprott, Andreas Herrmann, Hans‐Werner Bierhoff, & Elke Rohmann. (2015). The Influence of Trait and State Narcissism on the Uniqueness of Mass-Customized Products. Journal of Retailing. 92(2). 162–172. 60 indexed citations

17.

Bellis, Emanuel de, Christian Hildebrand, Kenichi Ito, & Andreas Herrmann. (2015). Cross-national differences in uncertainty avoidance predict the effectiveness of mass customization across East Asia: a large-scale field investigation. Marketing Letters. 26(3). 309–320. 28 indexed citations

18.

Bellis, Emanuel de. (2015). Die 3-K-Erfolgsfaktoren von Mass Customization. Marketing Review St Gallen. 32(2). 62–69.

19.

Bellis, Emanuel de, Jill Griffin, Christian Hildebrand, Reto Hofstetter, & Andreas Herrmann. (2013). Can't See the Forest for the Trees: Increased Local Processing in Mass Customization Systems. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 3 indexed citations

20.

Schulte‐Mecklenbeck, Michael, Matthias Sohn, Emanuel de Bellis, Nathalie Martin, & Ralph Hertwig. (2013). A lack of appetite for information and computation. Simple heuristics in food choice. Appetite. 71. 242–251. 98 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact