Ellen I. Garvie
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Food Science top 2%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Co-authors
- J. A. E. FARROWA.J. BramleyL. A. MabbittM. Elisabeth SharpeM. J. LathamO. KandlerD. HewittR. Fuller
- Topics
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods (15 papers)Microbial Metabolism and Applications (8 papers)Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ellen I. Garvie
41 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Molecular Biology 705
- Food Science 520
- Nutrition and Dietetics 195
- Materials Chemistry 190
- Biotechnology 136
Countries citing papers authored by Ellen I. Garvie
This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen I. Garvie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen I. Garvie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen I. Garvie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen I. Garvie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen I. Garvie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen I. Garvie. The network helps show where Ellen I. Garvie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ellen I. Garvie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ellen I. Garvie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ellen I. Garvie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ellen I. Garvie. Ellen I. Garvie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taxonomy and identification of bacteria important in cheese and fermented dairy products. | 19 |
| 2 | 35 | |
| 3 | 39 | |
| 4 | The Differentiation of Leuconostoc Oenos from Non-Acidophilic Species of Leuconostoc, and the Identification of Five Strains from the American Type Culture Collection | 19 |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 200 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 64 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 64 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Ellen I. Garvie
Ellen I. Garvie is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Endocrinology and Food Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Probiotics and Fermented Foods (15 papers), Microbial Metabolism and Applications (8 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (520 citations), Biochemistry (124 citations) and Biotechnology (136 citations). Ellen I. Garvie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. A. E. FARROW, A.J. Bramley, L. A. Mabbitt, M. Elisabeth Sharpe, M. J. Latham, O. Kandler, D. Hewitt, R. Fuller, Christopher B. Cole and F. L. Davies. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Bacteriology and Archives of Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.