F. L. Davies
- Food Science top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- B. A. LawSuzanne T. WilliamsMichael J. GassonM. J. GassonH. M. UNDERWOODH. BurtonC. I. MayfieldM. Ajmal Khan
- Topics
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods (15 papers)Microbial Inactivation Methods (6 papers)Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSri Lanka
In The Last Decade
F. L. Davies
31 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Food Science 852
- Molecular Biology 789
- Nutrition and Dietetics 264
- Biotechnology 261
- Plant Science 249
Countries citing papers authored by F. L. Davies
This map shows the geographic impact of F. L. Davies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. L. Davies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. L. Davies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. L. Davies
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. L. Davies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. L. Davies. The network helps show where F. L. Davies may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. L. Davies
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. L. Davies. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. L. Davies based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. L. Davies. F. L. Davies is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57 | |
| 2 | Flavour development in cheeses. | 43 |
| 3 | Non-sensory methods for cheese flavour assessment. | 3 |
| 4 | Taxonomy and identification of bacteria important in cheese and fermented dairy products. | 19 |
| 5 | Milk coagulation and the development of cheese texture. | 6 |
| 6 | Flavour development in fermented milks. | 12 |
| 7 | 89 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 63 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 79 | |
| 19 | 123 | |
| 20 | 109 |
About F. L. Davies
F. L. Davies is a scholar working on Microbiology, Food Science and Biotechnology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Probiotics and Fermented Foods (15 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (6 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (852 citations), Microbiology (25 citations) and Biotechnology (261 citations). F. L. Davies has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sri Lanka. Frequent co-authors include B. A. Law, Suzanne T. Williams, Michael J. Gasson, M. J. Gasson, H. M. UNDERWOOD, H. Burton, C. I. Mayfield, M. Ajmal Khan, Sarah E. Williams and B. E. Brooker. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Journal of Bacteriology and Soil Biology and Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.