dt ogilvie
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Accounting top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jill R. HoughLeyland M. LucasJanice M. BeyerPrithviraj ChattopadhyayElizabeth GeorgeWilliam H. GlickCameron M. FordFrieda Reitman
- Topics
- Innovation and Knowledge Management (7 papers)Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers)Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementStrategy and ManagementManagement of Technology and Innovation
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
dt ogilvie
17 papers receiving 484 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Strategy and Management 201
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 159
- Sociology and Political Science 77
- Management of Technology and Innovation 76
- Accounting 67
Countries citing papers authored by dt ogilvie
This map shows the geographic impact of dt ogilvie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by dt ogilvie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites dt ogilvie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by dt ogilvie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by dt ogilvie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by dt ogilvie. The network helps show where dt ogilvie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of dt ogilvie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of dt ogilvie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of dt ogilvie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with dt ogilvie. dt ogilvie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 76 | |
| 12 | 83 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 44 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 140 | |
| 19 | 38 |
About dt ogilvie
dt ogilvie is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Decision Sciences and Business and International Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 536 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (7 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (159 citations), Strategy and Management (201 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (76 citations) dt ogilvie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jill R. Hough, Leyland M. Lucas, Janice M. Beyer, Prithviraj Chattopadhyay, Elizabeth George, William H. Glick, Cameron M. Ford, Frieda Reitman, Joy A. Schneer and Corinne Post. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Business Research and Journal of Management Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.