Douglas Jesseph
Impact in
- Theoretical Computer Science top 2%
- History and Theory of Mathematics
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Philosophy and History of Science
- History of Science and Medicine
Papers in
-
- History and Theory of Mathematics 8
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science 18
- History of Science and Medicine 8
- Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Peter DearDavid SherryPaolo MancosuAlan RyanPatricia SpringborgJan M. PrinsTom SorellBernard Gert
- Journals
- Perspectives on Science (5 papers)The Philosophical Review (3 papers)Hobbes Studies (3 papers)Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (2 papers)Isis (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Douglas Jesseph
22 papers receiving 234 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Theoretical Computer Science 56
- History and Philosophy of Science 193
- Philosophy 105
- Anthropology 58
- History 28
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Jesseph
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Jesseph's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Jesseph with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Jesseph more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Jesseph
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Jesseph. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Jesseph. The network helps show where Douglas Jesseph may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Jesseph, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 8 | The A to Z of Descartes and Cartesian Philosophy | 2010 | 1 |
| 9 | 2010 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 147 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 23 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 0 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 27 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 34 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1990 | 2 |
About Douglas Jesseph
Douglas Jesseph is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Anthropology and Mathematical Physics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (18 papers), History of Science and Medicine (8 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (8 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (8 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (6 papers), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (3 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (3 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (56 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (193 citations), Philosophy (105 citations), Anthropology (58 citations) and History (28 citations). Douglas Jesseph has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Peter Dear, David Sherry, Paolo Mancosu, Alan Ryan, Patricia Springborg, Jan M. Prins, Tom Sorell, Bernard Gert, Maurice Goldsmith and Yves Charles Zarka. Their work appears in journals such as Perspectives on Science, The Philosophical Review, Hobbes Studies, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A and Isis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.