Mathematical Physics

535.3k papers and 7.7M indexed citations i.

About

535.3k papers covering Mathematical Physics have received a total of 7.7M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals, Advanced Algebra and Geometry and Inverse Problems in Mathematical Physics and Imaging and also cover the fields of Geometry and Topology, Applied Mathematics and Computational Theory and Mathematics. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Geometry and Topology, Applied Mathematics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Some of the most active scholars covering Mathematical Physics are Joseph Felsenstein, Tosio Kato, Edward Witten, Barry Simon, Jean Bourgain, Peter Grassberger, Per Christian Hansen, Victor G. Kač, G. Lusztig and David Ruelle.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Mathematical Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Mathematical Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Mathematical Physics.

Countries where authors publish papers about Mathematical Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Mathematical Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Mathematical Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathematical Physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025