This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Ariew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Ariew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Ariew more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Ariew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Ariew. The network helps show where Roger Ariew may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roger Ariew
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roger Ariew.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roger Ariew based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Roger Ariew. Roger Ariew is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jolley, Nicholas, Roger Ariew, Stuart M. Brown, et al.. (1994). The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Cambridge University Press eBooks.72 indexed citations
17.
Ariew, Roger & Peter Barker. (1992). Duhem and Continuity in the History of Science. Revue internationale de philosophie. 46(182).7 indexed citations
18.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Daniel Gärber, & Roger Ariew. (1991). Discourse on metaphysics and other essays.27 indexed citations
19.
Ariew, Roger & Peter Barker. (1990). Introduction. Synthese. 83(2). 179–182.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.