The Philosophical Review

3.6k papers and 143.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in The Philosophical Review in the last decades have received a total of 143.0k indexed citations. Papers published in The Philosophical Review usually cover Philosophy (1.1k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (395 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (307 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Philosophy and Thought (361 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (340 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (256 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Philosophical Review are Thomas Nagel, Noam Chomsky, Jerry A. Fodor, Christopher Hitchcock, Michael E. Bratman, Robert Cummins, John Rawls, Daniel C. Dennett, Judea Pearl and Gilbert Harman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Philosophical Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Philosophical Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Philosophical Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Philosophical Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Philosophical Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Philosophical Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Philosophical Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025