Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Natural Law and Natural Rights.
1981592 citationsRichard Tuck, John FinnisThe Philosophical Quarterlyprofile →
Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development
1981251 citationsMaryanne Cline Horowitz, Richard TuckThe American Historical Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Tuck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Tuck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Tuck more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Tuck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Tuck. The network helps show where Richard Tuck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Tuck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Tuck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Tuck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Tuck. Richard Tuck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tuck, Richard. (2020). The Left Case for Brexit: Reflections on the Current Crisis.1 indexed citations
2.
Kapossy, Béla, John M. Dunn, Raymond Geuss, et al.. (2018). Markets, Morals, Politics. Harvard University Press eBooks.3 indexed citations
Sorell, Tom, Noel Malcolm, Yves Charles Zarka, et al.. (1996). The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes. Cambridge University Press eBooks.23 indexed citations
Tuck, Richard & John Finnis. (1981). Natural Law and Natural Rights.. The Philosophical Quarterly. 31(124). 282–282.592 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Horowitz, Maryanne Cline & Richard Tuck. (1981). Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development. The American Historical Review. 86(2). 370–370.251 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Tuck, Richard. (1979). Natural Rights Theories. Cambridge University Press eBooks.236 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.