David Sherry
Impact in
- Theoretical Computer Science top 0.5%
- History and Theory of Mathematics
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
Papers in
-
- History and Theory of Mathematics 23
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science 12
- Philosophy and History of Science 10
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
- Co-authors
- Mikhail G. KatzDouglas JessephS. S. KutateladzeVladimir KanoveiDavid SchapsSteven ShniderR. ElyAlexandre Borovik
- Journals
- Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (7 papers)Foundations of Science (6 papers)Informal Logic (2 papers)Erkenntnis (1 paper)Philosophia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelPoland
In The Last Decade
David Sherry
33 papers receiving 279 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Theoretical Computer Science 176
- History and Philosophy of Science 150
- Mathematical Physics 127
- General Psychology 14
- Philosophy 34
Countries citing papers authored by David Sherry
This map shows the geographic impact of David Sherry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Sherry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Sherry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Sherry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Sherry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Sherry. The network helps show where David Sherry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside David Sherry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 34 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 27 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 1 |
About David Sherry
David Sherry is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Mathematical Physics, General Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 36 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (23 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (16 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (12 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (10 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (2 papers) and Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (176 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (150 citations), Mathematical Physics (127 citations), General Psychology (14 citations) and Philosophy (34 citations). David Sherry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Mikhail G. Katz, Douglas Jesseph, S. S. Kutateladze, Vladimir Kanovei, David Schaps, Steven Shnider, R. Ely, Alexandre Borovik, Mark van Atten and Thomas Mormann. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Foundations of Science, Informal Logic, Erkenntnis and Philosophia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.