Emily Grosholz

791 citations
43 papers · 220 indexed · h-index 7

Emily Grosholz

26 papers receiving 178 citations

Peers

Emily Grosholz
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Theoretical Computer Science 66
  • History and Philosophy of Science 92
  • Philosophy 51
  • Mathematical Physics 20
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 25
Replace Marco Panza with:
Marco Panza France
Brendan Larvor United Kingdom
Richard T. W. Arthur Canada
Douglas Jesseph United States
Volker Peckhaus Germany
José Ferreirós Spain
Karine Chemla France
Ian Mueller United States
Helena M. Pycior United States
G. J. Toomer United States
Emily Grosholz relative to Marco Panza France Marco Panza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Marco Panza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Grosholz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Grosholz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Grosholz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Grosholz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Grosholz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Grosholz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Grosholz. The network helps show where Emily Grosholz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Emily Grosholz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Grosholz Line = papers co-authored together Emily Grosholz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20150
2 20140
3 20131
4 20111
5
The Humanism of Ernst Cassirer
20101
6 20101
7 20091
8 20071
9 20051
10 20031
11
How Symbolic and Iconic Languages Bridge the Two Worlds of the Chemist
20002
12 200041
13
Leibniz's Science of the Rational
19986
14
W.E.B. Du Bois on Race and Culture Philosophy, Politics, and Poetics
199624
15 19961
16 19960
17 199111
18 19883
19 19870
20 19821

About Emily Grosholz

Emily Grosholz is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, General Psychology and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 220 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (11 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (4 papers), Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers) and African cultural and philosophical studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (66 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (92 citations), Philosophy (51 citations), Mathematical Physics (20 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (25 citations). Emily Grosholz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Bernard W. Bell, James B. Stewart, Roald Hoffmann and Alicia Ostriker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the History of Ideas, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, Hypatia, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026