Christia Mercer
- Philosophy top 2%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Eileen O’NeillCatherine WilsonStuart M. BrownDonald RutherfordDaniel GärberRoger AriewGregory BrownNicholas Jolley
- Topics
- Historical Philosophy and Science (9 papers)Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Christia Mercer
13 papers receiving 148 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Philosophy 111
- History and Philosophy of Science 110
- Sociology and Political Science 22
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 18
- Political Science and International Relations 14
Countries citing papers authored by Christia Mercer
This map shows the geographic impact of Christia Mercer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christia Mercer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christia Mercer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christia Mercer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christia Mercer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christia Mercer. The network helps show where Christia Mercer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christia Mercer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christia Mercer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christia Mercer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christia Mercer. Christia Mercer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | The methodology of the Meditations: tradition and innovation | 1 |
| 5 | Platonism in Early Modern Natural Philosophy: The Case of Leibniz and Conway | 0 |
| 6 | The Platonism at the Core of Leibniz's Metaphysics: God and Knowledge | 1 |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Kontinuitaet und Mechanismus | 2 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 72 |
About Christia Mercer
Christia Mercer is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Religious studies, having authored 18 papers that have together received 202 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (9 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (110 citations), Philosophy (111 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (10 citations). Christia Mercer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eileen O’Neill, Catherine Wilson, Stuart M. Brown, Donald Rutherford, Daniel Gärber, Roger Ariew, Gregory Brown, Nicholas Jolley, Brandon C. Look and Gregory Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Philosophical Topics and Journal of the history of philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.