Dennis Des Chene
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Philosophy top 5%
- History top 5%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Co-authors
- Marleen RozemondJohn H. ZammitoRichard T. W. ArthurMichael RuseDeborah BoyleCatherine WilsonAndrew S. PyleFrançois Duchesneau
- Topics
- Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers)Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers)History of Science and Medicine (3 papers)
- Journals
- The Philosophical ReviewStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical SciencesPerspectives on Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Dennis Des Chene
12 papers receiving 108 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- History and Philosophy of Science 93
- Philosophy 49
- History 37
- Anthropology 28
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 8
Countries citing papers authored by Dennis Des Chene
This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis Des Chene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis Des Chene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis Des Chene more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis Des Chene
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis Des Chene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis Des Chene. The network helps show where Dennis Des Chene may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dennis Des Chene
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dennis Des Chene. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dennis Des Chene based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dennis Des Chene. Dennis Des Chene is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The A to Z of Descartes and Cartesian Philosophy | 1 |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Life's Form: Late Aristotelian Conceptions of the Soul | 40 |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 |
About Dennis Des Chene
Dennis Des Chene is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and History, having authored 12 papers that have together received 136 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (93 citations), Philosophy (49 citations) and History (37 citations). Dennis Des Chene has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Marleen Rozemond, John H. Zammito, Richard T. W. Arthur, Michael Ruse, Deborah Boyle, Catherine Wilson, Andrew S. Pyle, François Duchesneau, Justin E. H. Smith and Karen Detlefsen. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences and Perspectives on Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.