Hobbes Studies

202 papers and 337 indexed citations i.

About

The 202 papers published in Hobbes Studies in the last decades have received a total of 337 indexed citations. Papers published in Hobbes Studies usually cover Philosophy (186 papers), Political Science and International Relations (89 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (73 papers) specifically the topics of Development of Political Thought in Early Modern Era (183 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (71 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Hobbes Studies are Robin Douglass, Annabel Brett, Katrin Flikschuh, S. A. Lloyd, Jeffrey Barnouw, Gianni Paganini, Karl Schuhmann, Noel Malcolm, Samuel I. Mintz and Daniel Eggers.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Hobbes Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Hobbes Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Hobbes Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Hobbes Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Hobbes Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Hobbes Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hobbes Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025