Hobbes Studies

207 papers and 424 indexed citations

About

The 207 papers published in Hobbes Studies in the last decades have received a total of 424 indexed citations. Papers published in Hobbes Studies usually cover Philosophy (190 papers), Political Science and International Relations (91 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (72 papers) specifically the topics of Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (187 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (70 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Hobbes Studies are Robin Douglass, Jeffrey Barnouw, Katrin Flikschuh, Annabel Brett, Douglas Jesseph, Karl Schuhmann, S. A. Lloyd, Gianni Paganini, Jeremy Rayner and Noel Malcolm.

In The Last Decade

Hobbes Studies

148 papers receiving 312 citations

Countries where authors publish in Hobbes Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Hobbes Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Hobbes Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hobbes Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Hobbes Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Hobbes Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Hobbes Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026