Hobbes Studies

205 papers and 356 indexed citations

About

The 205 papers published in Hobbes Studies in the last decades have received a total of 356 indexed citations. Papers published in Hobbes Studies usually cover Philosophy (188 papers), Political Science and International Relations (89 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (71 papers) specifically the topics of Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (185 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (69 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Hobbes Studies are Robin Douglass, Katrin Flikschuh, Annabel Brett, Jeffrey Barnouw, Karl Schuhmann, S. A. Lloyd, Douglas Jesseph, Gianni Paganini, Samuel I. Mintz and Johan Olsthoorn.

In The Last Decade

Hobbes Studies

131 papers receiving 259 citations

Fields of papers published in Hobbes Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Hobbes Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Hobbes Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Hobbes Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Hobbes Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Hobbes Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hobbes Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026