Diana Moses

434 total citations
19 papers, 267 citations indexed

About

Diana Moses is a scholar working on Education, Clinical Psychology and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana Moses has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 267 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Education, 2 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Diana Moses's work include Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (6 papers), Education Systems and Policy (6 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers). Diana Moses is often cited by papers focused on Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (6 papers), Education Systems and Policy (6 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers). Diana Moses collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Diana Moses's co-authors include Paul Croll, Seamus Hegarty, Sandra Jowett and D. Vijendra Babu and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Educational Studies, British Educational Research Journal and Educational Research.

In The Last Decade

Diana Moses

16 papers receiving 205 citations

Peers

Diana Moses
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Education 199
  • Clinical Psychology 83
  • Safety Research 77
  • Sociology and Political Science 46
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 45
Replace Lise Vislie with:
Lise Vislie Norway
Frances Gallannaugh United Kingdom
Eifred Markussen Norway
Svjetlana Curcic United States
Cheryl M. Lange United States
Nancy J. Zollers United States
Margaret A. Gallego United States
Margaret Winzer Canada
Soung Bae United States
Belinda J. Hardin United States
Lise Vislie Norway View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Diana Moses
Diana Moses · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Diana Moses
Diana Moses · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Moses

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Moses's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Moses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Moses more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Moses

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Moses. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Moses. The network helps show where Diana Moses may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Moses

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Moses. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Moses based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Moses. Diana Moses is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 2
3
One in Five : The Assessment and Incidence of Special Educational Needs
4
4 26
5 10
6 92
7
Special Needs in the Primary School: One in Five?
28
8 13
9 3
10 0
11 5
12 11
13
Supporting Ordinary Schools: LEA Initiatives
8
14 10
15 15
16 1
17 1
18
One in Five
35
19 3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026