Dénes Tóth

2.5k citations
11 papers · 964 · 1 hit paper · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Dénes Tóth

11 papers receiving 931 citations

Dénes Tóth's Hit Papers

Orthographic Depth and Its Impact on Universal Predictors of Reading 2010 · 607 citations
6070+5+10Years since publication200400600

Peers

Dénes Tóth
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 756
  • Statistics and Probability 285
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 367
  • Education 357
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 92
Replace Aibao Zhou with:
Aibao Zhou China
Eunsoo Cho United States
Timothy C. Papadopoulos Cyprus
Elena Florit Italy
Xinchun Wu China
Elizabeth B. Meisinger United States
Jeremy Miciak United States
Rachel Schiff Israel
Loren M. Marulis United States
Laurice M. Joseph United States
Dénes Tóth relative to Aibao Zhou China Aibao Zhou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Aibao Zhou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dénes Tóth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dénes Tóth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dénes Tóth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dénes Tóth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dénes Tóth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dénes Tóth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dénes Tóth. The network helps show where Dénes Tóth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dénes Tóth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dénes Tóth Line = papers co-authored together Dénes Tóth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1
Orthographic Depth and Its Impact on Universal Predictors of Reading
Hit paper breakdown →
2010607
2 2010141
3 2017133
4 201223
5 201914
6 201313
7 201812
8 20169
9 20167
10 20214
11 20211

About Dénes Tóth

Dénes Tóth is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 964 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (3 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (756 citations), Statistics and Probability (285 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (367 citations), Education (357 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (92 citations). Dénes Tóth has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Valéria Csépe, Daisy Bertrand, Leo Blomert, Anniek Vaessen, Luís Faísca, Alexandra Reis, Heikki Lyytinen, Johannes C. Ziegler, Nina L. Saine and Zsolt Demetrovics. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Child Development, Psychological Science, Frontiers in Psychology and Psychology of Addictive Behaviors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact