Debra J. Ford
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Daniel HartRobert AtkinsRahshida AtkinsJoann KeytonFaye L. SmithJoy KoestenPaul SchrodtRyan S. Bisel
- Topics
- Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers)Nursing education and management (3 papers)Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsMexico
In The Last Decade
Debra J. Ford
19 papers receiving 653 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Sociology and Political Science 240
- Social Psychology 215
- Clinical Psychology 152
- Safety Research 136
- Information Systems and Management 126
Countries citing papers authored by Debra J. Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of Debra J. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra J. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra J. Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Debra J. Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra J. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra J. Ford. The network helps show where Debra J. Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debra J. Ford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debra J. Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debra J. Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debra J. Ford. Debra J. Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | Examining Nurse Leader/Manager-Physician Communication Strategies: A Pilot Study | 1 |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 102 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 96 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | Teachers' Reflection on Reflection Practice | 5 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 53 | |
| 18 | 169 | |
| 19 | 181 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Debra J. Ford
Debra J. Ford is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 20 papers that have together received 736 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (126 citations), Research and Theory (15 citations) and Safety Research (136 citations). Debra J. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Hart, Robert Atkins, Rahshida Atkins, Joann Keyton, Faye L. Smith, Joy Koesten, Paul Schrodt, Ryan S. Bisel, Pamela Whitten and Nancy Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Social Issues and Journal of Nursing Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.