Paul Schrodt

5.3k total citations
117 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

Paul Schrodt is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Demography. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul Schrodt has authored 117 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 98 papers in Social Psychology, 52 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 50 papers in Demography. Recurrent topics in Paul Schrodt's work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (68 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (50 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (33 papers). Paul Schrodt is often cited by papers focused on Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (68 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (50 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (33 papers). Paul Schrodt collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and Ireland. Paul Schrodt's co-authors include Paul L. Witt, Andrew M. Ledbetter, Tamara D. Afifi, Paul D. Turman, Dawn O. Braithwaite, Amber N. Finn, Amber S. Messersmith, Ascan F. Koerner, Kodiane A. Jernberg and Jordan Soliz and has published in prestigious journals such as Communication Research, Human Communication Research and Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

In The Last Decade

Paul Schrodt

115 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Paul Schrodt United States 36 2.3k 1.5k 929 830 824 117 3.6k
Sheri R. Levy United States 36 2.2k 0.9× 2.4k 1.6× 548 0.6× 496 0.6× 474 0.6× 91 4.8k
Laura Stafford United States 31 2.7k 1.2× 1.9k 1.3× 311 0.3× 960 1.2× 805 1.0× 60 4.3k
Anita L. Vangelisti United States 27 2.2k 1.0× 1.1k 0.8× 247 0.3× 1.1k 1.3× 480 0.6× 75 3.3k
Dawn O. Braithwaite United States 27 1.3k 0.5× 1.6k 1.1× 245 0.3× 681 0.8× 709 0.9× 68 2.9k
Brant R. Burleson United States 42 3.2k 1.4× 1.5k 1.0× 574 0.6× 1.5k 1.8× 332 0.4× 113 4.9k
David Y. F. Ho Hong Kong 25 1.5k 0.7× 1.2k 0.8× 526 0.6× 965 1.2× 252 0.3× 53 3.4k
Çiğdem Kâğıtçıbaşı Türkiye 33 2.4k 1.0× 1.9k 1.3× 1.5k 1.6× 1.8k 2.2× 499 0.6× 73 5.2k
Gisela Trommsdorff Germany 33 1.7k 0.7× 1.1k 0.8× 897 1.0× 1.1k 1.4× 315 0.4× 210 3.7k
Camillo Regalia Italy 26 1.8k 0.8× 1.2k 0.8× 355 0.4× 1.4k 1.7× 246 0.3× 79 3.3k
Bruce Hunsberger Canada 40 2.7k 1.2× 3.9k 2.7× 959 1.0× 1.4k 1.6× 436 0.5× 68 6.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Schrodt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Schrodt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Schrodt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Schrodt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Schrodt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Schrodt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Schrodt. The network helps show where Paul Schrodt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Schrodt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Schrodt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Schrodt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Schrodt. Paul Schrodt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Schrodt, Paul & Tamara D. Afifi. (2017). Untying the Ties That Bind: Dispositional and Relational Patterns of Negative Relational Disclosures and Family Members’ Feelings of Being Caught. Journal of Family Issues. 39(7). 1962–1983. 7 indexed citations
4.
Schrodt, Paul, et al.. (2016). Family Communication Patterns, Parental Modeling, and Confirmation in Romantic Relationships. Communication Quarterly. 64(4). 454–475. 17 indexed citations
5.
Schrodt, Paul, et al.. (2016). The Perceived Threat and Resolvability of Serial Arguments as Correlates of Relational Uncertainty in Romantic Relationships. Communication Studies. 68(1). 56–71. 4 indexed citations
6.
Schrodt, Paul. (2015). Quantitative Approaches to Dyadic Data Analyses in Family Communication Research: An Invited Essay. Journal of Family Communication. 15(3). 175–184. 3 indexed citations
7.
Koerner, Ascan F. & Paul Schrodt. (2014). An Introduction to the Special Issue on Family Communication Patterns Theory. Journal of Family Communication. 14(1). 1–15. 128 indexed citations
8.
Schrodt, Paul, et al.. (2013). Privacy Orientations as a Function of Family Communication Patterns. Communication Reports. 26(1). 1–12. 23 indexed citations
9.
Schrodt, Paul, et al.. (2012). Do Parenting Styles Moderate the Association Between Family Conformity Orientation and Young Adults' Mental Well-Being?. Journal of Family Communication. 12(2). 151–166. 35 indexed citations
10.
Schrodt, Paul, et al.. (2012). Rumination, Conflict Intensity, and Perceived Resolvability as Predictors of Motivation and Likelihood of Continuing Serial Arguments. Western Journal of Communication. 76(5). 480–502. 15 indexed citations
11.
Kellas, Jody Koenig, et al.. (2010). Exploring Links Between Well-Being and Interactional Sense-Making in Married Couples' Jointly Told Stories of Stress. Journal of Family Communication. 10(3). 174–193. 55 indexed citations
12.
Koesten, Joy, Paul Schrodt, & Debra J. Ford. (2009). Cognitive Flexibility as a Mediator of Family Communication Environments and Young Adults' Well-Being. Health Communication. 24(1). 82–94. 102 indexed citations
13.
Schrodt, Paul, et al.. (2009). Instructor Credibility as a Mediator of Instructors’ Prosocial Communication Behaviors and Students’ Learning Outcomes. Communication Education. 58(3). 350–371. 65 indexed citations
14.
Schrodt, Paul. (2009). Family Strength and Satisfaction as Functions of Family Communication Environments. Communication Quarterly. 57(2). 171–186. 48 indexed citations
15.
Schrodt, Paul. (2008). Sex Differences in Stepchildren's Reports of Stepfamily Functioning. Communication Reports. 21(1). 46–58. 8 indexed citations
16.
Schrodt, Paul & Paul D. Turman. (2005). The Impact of Instructional Technology Use, Course Design, and Sex Differences on Students’ Initial Perceptions of Instructor Credibility. Communication Quarterly. 53(2). 177–196. 41 indexed citations
17.
Turman, Paul D. & Paul Schrodt. (2005). The influence of instructional technology use on students’ affect: Do course designs and biological sex make a difference?. Communication Studies. 56(2). 109–129. 20 indexed citations
18.
Turman, Paul D. & Paul Schrodt. (2004). New avenues for instructional communication research: Relationships among coaches’ leadership behaviors and athletes’ affective learning. Communication Research Reports. 21(2). 130–143. 31 indexed citations
19.
Schrodt, Paul, et al.. (2003). An Examination of Academic Mentoring Behaviors and New Faculty Members' Satisfaction with Socialization and Tenure and Promotion Processes. Communication Education. 52(1). 17–29. 103 indexed citations
20.
Schrodt, Paul, et al.. (2000). Informational reception apprehension, educational motivation, and achievement. Communication Quarterly. 48(1). 60–73. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026