Daniel Scott Smith

2.6k citations
83 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 20

Daniel Scott Smith

77 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel Scott Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Gender Studies 286
  • Demography 273
  • Health Informatics 26
  • History 181
  • Economics and Econometrics 325
Replace Judith Allen with:
Judith Allen Australia
John Gallagher United States
Patrick Love France
John T. Noonan United States
U. S. Bureau of the Census
Elizabeth A. Williams United States
Martin Shaw United Kingdom
Paul Lawrence United Kingdom
Francisco Gutiérrez Sanín Colombia
Todd Landman United Kingdom
Daniel Scott Smith relative to Judith Allen Australia Judith Allen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Judith Allen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Scott Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Scott Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Scott Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Scott Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Scott Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Scott Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Scott Smith. The network helps show where Daniel Scott Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Scott Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Scott Smith Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Scott Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 202470
3 20242
4 20242
5 20231
6 20232
7
Truck Appointment Systems: Where We Are and Where to Go From Here
20163
8
Experimental investigation of transition to turbulence in arteriovenous grafts.
20081
9 20033
10 200219
11 19943
12 199320
13 19891
14
The Influence of Malthus. (Book Reviews: Malthus Past and Present)
19852
15 19851
16 19835
17 19831
18 197510
19
Population, family and society in Hingham, Massachusetts, 1635-1880
19737
20 19731

About Daniel Scott Smith

Daniel Scott Smith is a scholar working on Health Informatics, History and Marketing, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (20 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (11 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (11 papers), American History and Culture (9 papers), Maritime Ports and Logistics (5 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (4 papers), Urban and Freight Transport Logistics (4 papers) and Global Educational Policies and Reforms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (286 citations), Demography (273 citations) and Health Informatics (26 citations). Daniel Scott Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Charles Tilly, David I. Levine, Nathan Huynh, A.A.P.O. Janssens, Daniel A. McFarland, W. Peter Ward, John Demos, J. David Hacker, Bas Hofstra and Hancheng Cao. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, The American Historical Review, Social Science History, The William and Mary Quarterly and Journal of Family History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026