Journal of Family History

1.0k papers and 8.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Journal of Family History in the last decades have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Family History usually cover Sociology and Political Science (398 papers), History (327 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (297 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Economic and Social Studies (284 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (203 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Family History are Glen H. Elder, John Modell, David I. Kertzer, Peter Uhlenberg, Peter Laslett, Bonnie Thornton Dill, Daniel Scott Smith, Diane Owen Hughes, Tamara Κ. Hareven and Theodore Hershberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Family History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Family History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Family History.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Family History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Family History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Family History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Family History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025