John Demos
- General Psychology top 10%
- History top 0.5%
- Mormonism, Religion, and History 5
- Archeology top 10%
-
- Canadian Identity and History 3
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 3
- Anthropology top 5%
- Archaeology and Natural History 7
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 7
-
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 4
-
- American History and Culture 3
-
- Media, Gender, and Advertising 3
- Co-authors
- Kai EriksonRobert MiddlekauffPhilip GrevenTerry BurkeKenneth A. LockridgeJohn J. WatersMichael McGiffertW. Andrew Achenbaum
- Cited by
- General PsychologyHistoryArcheology
- Journals
- The William and Mary Quarterly (12 papers)The American Historical Review (9 papers)The New England Quarterly (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Demos
49 papers receiving 817 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- General Psychology 23
- History 177
- Archeology 15
- Sociology and Political Science 603
- Anthropology 118
Countries citing papers authored by John Demos
This map shows the geographic impact of John Demos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Demos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Demos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Demos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Demos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Demos. The network helps show where John Demos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Demos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 7 | Remarkable providences : readings on early American history | 1991 | 4 |
| 8 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1983 | 27 | |
| 10 | 1983 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1980 | 37 | |
| 12 | 1976 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1973 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1972 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1970 | 171 | |
| 16 | 1970 | 81 | |
| 17 | 1970 | 13 | |
| 18 | 1967 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1965 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1964 | 14 |
About John Demos
John Demos is a scholar working on General Psychology, Anthropology, History, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (7 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (7 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (5 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (4 papers), Canadian Identity and History (3 papers), American History and Culture (3 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (3 papers) and Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (23 citations), History (177 citations), Archeology (15 citations), Sociology and Political Science (603 citations) and Anthropology (118 citations). John Demos has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kai Erikson, Robert Middlekauff, Philip Greven, Terry Burke, Kenneth A. Lockridge, John J. Waters, Michael McGiffert, W. Andrew Achenbaum, Alan M. Taylor and Robert V. Wells. Their work appears in journals such as The William and Mary Quarterly, The American Historical Review, The New England Quarterly, Journal of American History and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.