Daniel C. Edelson

6.1k total citations · 3 hit papers
49 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Daniel C. Edelson is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel C. Edelson has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Education, 28 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 9 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Daniel C. Edelson's work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (25 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (11 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (9 papers). Daniel C. Edelson is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (25 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (11 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (9 papers). Daniel C. Edelson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Cyprus and Switzerland. Daniel C. Edelson's co-authors include Roy Pea, Douglas N. Gordin, Eric A. Domeshek, Brian J. Reiser, Eleni Α. Kyza, Elliot Soloway, Chris Quintana, Joseph Krajcik, Ravit Golan Duncan and Elizabeth A. Davis and has published in prestigious journals such as Communications of the ACM, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment and Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

In The Last Decade

Daniel C. Edelson

48 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Hit Papers

A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Sc... 1999 2026 2008 2017 2004 1999 2002 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel C. Edelson United States 19 2.3k 1.8k 536 469 303 49 3.7k
Susan M. Land United States 25 2.3k 1.0× 1.9k 1.1× 654 1.2× 500 1.1× 279 0.9× 75 3.5k
Thomas M. Duffy United States 19 2.9k 1.3× 1.7k 0.9× 714 1.3× 504 1.1× 338 1.1× 69 4.4k
Brent Wilson United States 23 2.1k 0.9× 1.2k 0.6× 509 0.9× 435 0.9× 334 1.1× 135 3.5k
Richard Lehrer United States 32 3.6k 1.6× 2.1k 1.1× 647 1.2× 302 0.6× 377 1.2× 101 5.5k
Ravit Golan Duncan United States 22 2.8k 1.3× 1.9k 1.0× 360 0.7× 259 0.6× 267 0.9× 64 3.9k
Barry Fishman United States 29 4.0k 1.8× 2.1k 1.2× 427 0.8× 424 0.9× 460 1.5× 97 5.3k
Douglas B. Clark United States 29 2.4k 1.0× 2.9k 1.6× 999 1.9× 367 0.8× 452 1.5× 85 4.3k
Ard W. Lazonder Netherlands 29 1.5k 0.7× 1.4k 0.7× 349 0.7× 485 1.0× 175 0.6× 72 2.7k
Brian R. Belland United States 29 2.5k 1.1× 1.3k 0.7× 701 1.3× 533 1.1× 292 1.0× 64 3.3k
Sara Hennessy United Kingdom 36 3.2k 1.4× 1.4k 0.8× 444 0.8× 979 2.1× 393 1.3× 97 4.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Edelson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Edelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Edelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Edelson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Edelson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Edelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Edelson. The network helps show where Daniel C. Edelson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel C. Edelson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel C. Edelson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel C. Edelson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel C. Edelson. Daniel C. Edelson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Edelson, Daniel C., Brian J. Reiser, Katherine L. McNeill, et al.. (2021). Developing Research-Based Instructional Materials to Support Large-Scale Transformation of Science Teaching and Learning: The Approach of the OpenSciEd Middle School Program. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 32(7). 780–804. 46 indexed citations
2.
Edelson, Daniel C., et al.. (2013). A Road Map for Improving Geography Assessment. The Geography Teacher. 10(1). 15–21. 6 indexed citations
3.
Fishman, Barry, Spyros Konstantopoulos, Beth Kubitskey, et al.. (2013). Comparing the Impact of Online and Face-to-Face Professional Development in the Context of Curriculum Implementation. Journal of Teacher Education. 64(5). 426–438. 203 indexed citations
4.
Hammer, David, Loucas S. Louca, Bruce Sherin, et al.. (2008). How to study learning processes? reflection on methods for fine-grain data analysis. 306–313. 2 indexed citations
5.
Edelson, Daniel C.. (2007). Environmental Science for All? Considering Environmental Science for Inclusion in the High School Core Curriculum. Science educator. 16(1). 42–56. 15 indexed citations
6.
Edelson, Daniel C., et al.. (2006). Learning to Make Systematic Decisions.. The Science Teacher. 73(4). 40–45. 13 indexed citations
7.
Edelson, Daniel C.. (2004). The Parallel Universes of the Learning Sciences and Instructional Design: A Historical Perspective. Educational technology: The magazine for managers of change in education. 44(3). 27–29. 2 indexed citations
8.
Edelson, Daniel C., et al.. (2004). Teaching scientific principles through a computer-based, design-centered learning environment. PhDT. 1 indexed citations
9.
Edelson, Daniel C.. (2004). My world: a case study in adapting scientists' tools for learners. 597–597. 1 indexed citations
10.
Edelson, Daniel C. & Diana Joseph. (2004). The interest-driven learning design framework: motivating learning through usefulness. 166–173. 50 indexed citations
11.
Quintana, Chris, Brian J. Reiser, Elizabeth A. Davis, et al.. (2004). A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 13(3). 337–386. 670 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Sherin, Bruce, Brian J. Reiser, & Daniel C. Edelson. (2004). Scaffolding Analysis: Extending the Scaffolding Metaphor to Learning Artifacts. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 13(3). 387–421. 66 indexed citations
13.
Edelson, Daniel C.. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 38(3). 355–385. 264 indexed citations
14.
Radinsky, Josh, et al.. (1999). Problematizing Complex Datasets for Students: Design Principles for Inquiry Curriculum.. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. 1999(1). 9 indexed citations
15.
Edelson, Daniel C., Douglas N. Gordin, & Roy Pea. (1999). Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 8(3-4). 391–450. 251 indexed citations
16.
Brown, Matthew & Daniel C. Edelson. (1999). A lab by any other name. 8–es. 2 indexed citations
17.
Edelson, Daniel C.. (1998). Matching the Design of Activities to the Affordances of Software to Support Inquiry-Based Learning. 4 indexed citations
18.
Radinsky, Josh, et al.. (1997). The progress Portfolio. 176–185. 32 indexed citations
19.
Edelson, Daniel C.. (1993). Socrates, Aesops and the Computer: Questioning and Storytelling with Multimedia.. Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia. 2(4). 393–404. 1 indexed citations
20.
Edelson, Daniel C.. (1992). When should a cheetah remind you of a bat? reminding in case-based teaching. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 667–672. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026