Dana L. Chesney

567 citations
25 papers · 384 indexed · h-index 12

Dana L. Chesney

24 papers receiving 363 citations

Peers

Dana L. Chesney
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Statistics and Probability 273
  • General Decision Sciences 39
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 119
  • Education 241
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
Replace Thomas J. Faulkenberry with:
Thomas J. Faulkenberry United States
Jo Van Hoof Belgium
Meindert Beishuizen Netherlands
Michelle Hurst United States
Hee Seung Lee South Korea
Aryn Pyke United States
Chungsoon C. Kim United States
Shawn Betts United States
Moira Rose Dillon United States
Jennifer Krawec United States
Dana L. Chesney relative to Thomas J. Faulkenberry United States Thomas J. Faulkenberry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Thomas J. Faulkenberry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dana L. Chesney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dana L. Chesney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dana L. Chesney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dana L. Chesney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dana L. Chesney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dana L. Chesney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dana L. Chesney. The network helps show where Dana L. Chesney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Dana L. Chesney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dana L. Chesney Line = papers co-authored together Dana L. Chesney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20246
2 20220
3 20217
4 20185
5 20189
6 201813
7
The Relationship Between the Numerical Distance Effect and Approximate Number System Acuity is Non-Linear.
20161
8 201615
9 201556
10 201541
11 201520
12 20155
13 20143
14 201310
15 201338
16 201325
17 201211
18 20116
19 201135
20 20091

About Dana L. Chesney

Dana L. Chesney is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Statistics and Probability and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (20 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (15 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers) and Education Methods and Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (273 citations), General Decision Sciences (39 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (119 citations). Dana L. Chesney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Percival G. Matthews, Nicole M. McNeil, Harry Haroutioun Haladjian, Ellen Peters, Rochel Gelman, Emily R. Fyfe, Pär Bjälkebring, James R. Brockmole, Ken Kelley and Brittany Shoots‐Reinhard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Cognitive Psychology and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026