Christopher J. Langmead
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Physiology top 0.5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 1%
- Co-authors
- Arthur ChristopoulosJeannette M. WatsonGuillaume LebonK.A. BennettCharlie ReavillChristopher G. TateAndrew G. W. LesliePatricia C. Edwards
- Topics
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (67 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (26 papers)Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (25 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Christopher J. Langmead
85 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Molecular Biology 3.0k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.9k
- Physiology 500
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 400
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 390
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher J. Langmead
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher J. Langmead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher J. Langmead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher J. Langmead more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher J. Langmead
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher J. Langmead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher J. Langmead. The network helps show where Christopher J. Langmead may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher J. Langmead
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher J. Langmead. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher J. Langmead based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher J. Langmead. Christopher J. Langmead is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 53 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 88 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 126 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 98 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 56 | |
| 20 | 90 |
About Christopher J. Langmead
Christopher J. Langmead is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 85 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (67 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (26 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (500 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.9k citations) and Molecular Biology (3.0k citations). Christopher J. Langmead has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Arthur Christopoulos, Jeannette M. Watson, Guillaume Lebon, K.A. Bennett, Charlie Reavill, Christopher G. Tate, Andrew G. W. Leslie, Patricia C. Edwards, Tony Warne and Patrick M. Sexton. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.