Molecular Pharmacology

12.0k papers and 602.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 12.0k papers published in Molecular Pharmacology in the last decades have received a total of 602.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Molecular Pharmacology usually cover Molecular Biology (8.1k papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (3.5k papers) and Oncology (1.5k papers) specifically the topics of Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3.0k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1.9k papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (1.5k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Pharmacology are Solomon H. Snyder, Robert J. Lefkowitz, Keith Williams, Doyle G. Graham, Graeme Milligan, A­llyn C. Howlett, D. J. Birkett, Gillian Sudlow, D. N. Wade and Alan Poland.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Molecular Pharmacology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Pharmacology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Pharmacology.

Countries where authors publish in Molecular Pharmacology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Pharmacology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Pharmacology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Pharmacology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025