Chih‐Ting Shih

537 total citations
19 papers, 402 citations indexed

About

Chih‐Ting Shih is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Chih‐Ting Shih has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 402 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Chih‐Ting Shih's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (12 papers), Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring (4 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). Chih‐Ting Shih is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (12 papers), Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring (4 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). Chih‐Ting Shih collaborates with scholars based in Taiwan. Chih‐Ting Shih's co-authors include Chih‐Hsun Chuang, Hao‐Chieh Lin, Shu‐Ling Chen, Shyh‐Jer Chen, Cheng-Chen Lin, Yufang Li, Nai‐Wen Chi, Ing‐Chung Huang, Li‐Ju Chen and Man‐Hsin Hung and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Management, Expert Systems with Applications and International Journal of Production Economics.

In The Last Decade

Chih‐Ting Shih

18 papers receiving 387 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chih‐Ting Shih Taiwan 13 195 84 69 56 56 19 402
Biyan Wen China 9 308 1.6× 148 1.8× 28 0.4× 76 1.4× 29 0.5× 25 442
Kit Brooks United States 6 124 0.6× 76 0.9× 15 0.2× 52 0.9× 65 1.2× 13 485
Peter Nielsen Denmark 10 87 0.4× 92 1.1× 91 1.3× 28 0.5× 161 2.9× 50 587
Helen Bruce United Kingdom 10 155 0.8× 164 2.0× 28 0.4× 10 0.2× 80 1.4× 22 497
Paul W. Thurston United States 8 124 0.6× 36 0.4× 17 0.2× 34 0.6× 26 0.5× 28 319
Mary K. Hamman United States 7 80 0.4× 42 0.5× 50 0.7× 8 0.1× 258 4.6× 11 478
Ellen Baker Australia 8 74 0.4× 112 1.3× 25 0.4× 35 0.6× 40 0.7× 18 295
J. Down United Kingdom 6 100 0.5× 108 1.3× 8 0.1× 72 1.3× 181 3.2× 10 522
Gaye Karaçay Türkiye 8 151 0.8× 54 0.6× 14 0.2× 49 0.9× 54 1.0× 17 281

Countries citing papers authored by Chih‐Ting Shih

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chih‐Ting Shih's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chih‐Ting Shih with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chih‐Ting Shih more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chih‐Ting Shih

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chih‐Ting Shih. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chih‐Ting Shih. The network helps show where Chih‐Ting Shih may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chih‐Ting Shih

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chih‐Ting Shih. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chih‐Ting Shih based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chih‐Ting Shih. Chih‐Ting Shih is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Shih, Chih‐Ting, et al.. (2023). The supervisor's paradox: Why different psychological contract types lead to varied supervisory mentoring. Journal of Management & Organization. 30(6). 2047–2065. 1 indexed citations
2.
Shih, Chih‐Ting, et al.. (2023). To lead or not? The role theory perspective on the moderating roles of transformational and laissez-faire leadership in shared leadership teams. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 42(2). 633–660. 7 indexed citations
3.
Shih, Chih‐Ting, et al.. (2019). How autonomy-supportive leaders influence employee service performance: a multilevel study. Service Industries Journal. 42(7-8). 630–651. 19 indexed citations
4.
Chen, Shu‐Ling, Chih‐Ting Shih, & Nai‐Wen Chi. (2018). A multilevel job demands–resources model of work engagement: Antecedents, consequences, and boundary conditions. Human Performance. 31(5). 282–304. 21 indexed citations
5.
Li, Yufang, et al.. (2017). Nurses’ intention to resign and avoidance of emergency department violence: A moderated mediation model. International Emergency Nursing. 39. 55–61. 27 indexed citations
6.
Hsieh, Feng‐Shu, Yao‐Li Chen, Man‐Hsin Hung, et al.. (2017). Palbociclib induces activation of AMPK and inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma in a CDK4/6‐independent manner. Molecular Oncology. 11(8). 1035–1049. 55 indexed citations
7.
Shih, Chih‐Ting, et al.. (2016). Customer service-focused HRM systems and firm performance: evidence from the service industry in Taiwan. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 29(19). 2804–2826. 21 indexed citations
8.
Shih, Chih‐Ting, et al.. (2015). Nurse occupational burnout and patient‐rated quality of care: The boundary conditions of emotional intelligence and demographic profiles. Japan Journal of Nursing Science. 13(1). 156–165. 29 indexed citations
9.
Shih, Chih‐Ting & Shu‐Ling Chen. (2015). Autonomy-Support Climate and Service Performance. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2015(1). 13114–13114.
10.
Chien, Shih-Wen, et al.. (2014). A Moderated Mediation Study: Cohesion Linking Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces to ERP Implementation Performance. International Journal of Production Economics. 158. 1–8. 8 indexed citations
11.
Shih, Chih‐Ting, et al.. (2013). Responsible downsizing strategy as a panacea to firm performance: the role of dynamic capabilities. International Journal of Manpower. 34(8). 1015–1028. 16 indexed citations
12.
Shih, Chih‐Ting, et al.. (2013). When responsible downsizing strategy meets employee-oriented leadership: Implications for downsizing performance. Journal of Management & Organization. 19(5). 583–597. 2 indexed citations
13.
Shih, Chih‐Ting & Chih‐Hsun Chuang. (2012). Individual differences, psychological contract breach, and organizational citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation study. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 30(1). 191–210. 51 indexed citations
14.
Shih, Chih‐Ting, et al.. (2012). Labor union negotiations: stepping stones or stumbling blocks for a responsible downsizing strategy? Empirical tests in Taiwan. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 24(3). 601–620. 12 indexed citations
15.
Shih, Chih‐Ting & Cheng-Chen Lin. (2012). From good friends to good soldiers: A psychological contract perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 31(1). 309–326. 21 indexed citations
16.
Shih, Chih‐Ting & Shyh‐Jer Chen. (2010). The Social Dilemma Perspective on Psychological Contract Fulfilment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour. Management and Organization Review. 7(1). 125–151. 34 indexed citations
17.
Lin, Hao‐Chieh & Chih‐Ting Shih. (2008). How Executive SHRM System Links to Firm Performance: The Perspectives of Upper Echelon and Competitive Dynamics†. Journal of Management. 34(5). 853–881. 48 indexed citations
19.
Huang, Ing‐Chung, et al.. (2005). Mining the Generation Xers' job attitudes by artificial neural network and decision tree—empirical evidence in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications. 29(4). 783–794. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026