Charlotte De Backer
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Food Science top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Liselot HuddersSara PabianHeidi VandeboschTim SmitsYara QutteinaGaëlle OuvreinMaryanne L. FisherKarolien Poels
- Topics
- Culinary Culture and Tourism (15 papers)Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (15 papers)Digital Marketing and Social Media (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Charlotte De Backer
74 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Sociology and Political Science 603
- Clinical Psychology 390
- Food Science 377
- Social Psychology 371
- Ecology 341
Countries citing papers authored by Charlotte De Backer
This map shows the geographic impact of Charlotte De Backer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charlotte De Backer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charlotte De Backer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charlotte De Backer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charlotte De Backer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charlotte De Backer. The network helps show where Charlotte De Backer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charlotte De Backer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charlotte De Backer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charlotte De Backer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charlotte De Backer. Charlotte De Backer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 69 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | The rival wears prada: female luxury consumption as an intrasexual competition strategy | 2 |
| 17 | Test sections in high-modulus asphalt: a comparative experiment with ten variants | 1 |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | COLD-MIX ASPHALT SURFACINGS: FIRST EXPERIMENTS IN BELGIUM | 1 |
| 20 | Maslow revisited: towards a new motivation inventory based on evolutionary psychology | 1 |
About Charlotte De Backer
Charlotte De Backer is a scholar working on Marketing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 79 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Culinary Culture and Tourism (15 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (15 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (333 citations), Food Science (377 citations) and Applied Psychology (98 citations). Charlotte De Backer has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Liselot Hudders, Sara Pabian, Heidi Vandebosch, Tim Smits, Yara Qutteina, Gaëlle Ouvrein, Maryanne L. Fisher, Karolien Poels, Sara Erreygers and Patrick Vyncke. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Computers in Human Behavior and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.