Emma L. Sharp

37 papers receiving 385 citations

Peers

Emma L. Sharp
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Geography, Planning and Development 44
  • Equine 5
  • Food Science 45
  • Epidemiology 75
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 23
Replace Robert E. Parker with:
Robert E. Parker United States
Katy Wilkinson United Kingdom
Rahman Rahman Indonesia
David Nkedianye Kenya
Áine Macken‐Walsh Ireland
Nyak Ilham Indonesia
James James United States
Christine Harmant France
Philip Wheeler United Kingdom
Lesley Hunt United Kingdom
Emma L. Sharp relative to Robert E. Parker United States Robert E. Parker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.6×
Robert E. Parker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma L. Sharp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma L. Sharp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma L. Sharp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma L. Sharp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma L. Sharp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma L. Sharp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma L. Sharp. The network helps show where Emma L. Sharp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma L. Sharp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma L. Sharp Line = papers co-authored together Emma L. Sharp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200745
2 200935
3 200725
4 202219
5 202018
6 200218
7 202116
8 200816
9 200216
10 202213
11 202412
12 202212
13 201711
14 200711
15 201510
16 202310
17 202210
18 202310
19 202010
20 202110

About Emma L. Sharp

Emma L. Sharp is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Geography, Planning and Development, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic Food and Agriculture (7 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (7 papers), Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (5 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (4 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (3 papers) and Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (44 citations), Equine (5 citations), Food Science (45 citations), Epidemiology (75 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (23 citations). Emma L. Sharp has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Davis‐Poynter, Helen E. Farrell, Nicholas E. Leadbeater, Mélanie Kah, Mette M. Rosenkilde, Tau Benned‐Jensen, Jennifer Salmond, Stefan Bräse, Stefan Dahmen and Frank Lauterwasser. Their work appears in journals such as New Zealand Geographer, Sustainability, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Asia Pacific Viewpoint and Journal of General Virology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact