B. Navez

571 total citations
9 papers, 410 citations indexed

About

B. Navez is a scholar working on Plant Science, Food Science and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, B. Navez has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 410 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Plant Science, 5 papers in Food Science and 1 paper in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in B. Navez's work include Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (5 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (4 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (4 papers). B. Navez is often cited by papers focused on Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (5 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (4 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (4 papers). B. Navez collaborates with scholars based in France, Morocco and Netherlands. B. Navez's co-authors include Dominique Grasselly, Michel M. Génard, Hélène Gautier, Camille Bénard, Frédéric Bourgaud, Marie Weiss, Catherine Caris‐Veyrat, Mathilde Causse, Elisabetta Moneta and Silvana Grandillo and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of Food Science and Postharvest Biology and Technology.

In The Last Decade

B. Navez

8 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
B. Navez France	5	326	82	64	62	33	9	410
Paul Metheney United States	6	304 0.9×	75 0.9×	87 1.4×	50 0.8×	14 0.4×	9	360
Loreto Contador Chile	14	323 1.0×	64 0.8×	34 0.5×	54 0.9×	12 0.4×	25	410
J.F. Hermoso Spain	10	265 0.8×	91 1.1×	20 0.3×	36 0.6×	23 0.7×	27	368
R. K. Patel India	9	291 0.9×	50 0.6×	35 0.5×	37 0.6×	18 0.5×	75	371
Patricia Oteng‐Darko Ghana	11	145 0.4×	103 1.3×	29 0.5×	26 0.4×	36 1.1×	24	285
Paulo Barracosa Portugal	11	239 0.7×	122 1.5×	26 0.4×	44 0.7×	15 0.5×	18	370
G. Villari Italy	10	322 1.0×	54 0.7×	64 1.0×	53 0.9×	65 2.0×	17	415
Mehmet Ali Sarıdaş Türkiye	12	290 0.9×	36 0.4×	59 0.9×	38 0.6×	43 1.3×	50	352
Alessandra Gallotta Italy	9	544 1.7×	262 3.2×	61 1.0×	88 1.4×	11 0.3×	27	624
Ibrahim I. Tahir Sweden	10	307 0.9×	49 0.6×	40 0.6×	61 1.0×	25 0.8×	20	370

Countries citing papers authored by B. Navez

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Navez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Navez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Navez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Navez

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Navez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Navez. The network helps show where B. Navez may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Navez

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Navez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Navez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B. Navez. B. Navez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Sinesio, Fiorella, Maria Cammareri, Elisabetta Moneta, et al.. (2021). Sensory Traits and Consumer’s Perceived Quality of Traditional and Modern Fresh Market Tomato Varieties: A Study in Three European Countries. Foods. 10(11). 2521–2521. 18 indexed citations

2.

Navez, B., et al.. (2017). Carrot organoleptic quality as related to cultivar and production area. Acta Horticulturae. 125–132. 2 indexed citations

3.

Navez, B., et al.. (2015). FRENCH CONSUMER PREFERENCES REVEAL A POTENTIAL FOR SEGMENTATION IN CARROTS. Acta Horticulturae. 45–51. 3 indexed citations

4.

Causse, Mathilde, Chloé Friguet, B. Navez, et al.. (2010). Consumer Preferences for Fresh Tomato at the European Scale: A Common Segmentation on Taste and Firmness. Journal of Food Science. 75(9). S531–41. 115 indexed citations

5.

Sinesio, Fiorella, Maria Cammareri, Elisabetta Moneta, et al.. (2009). Sensory Quality of Fresh French and Dutch Market Tomatoes: A Preference Mapping Study with Italian Consumers. Journal of Food Science. 75(1). S55–67. 55 indexed citations

6.

Bénard, Camille, Hélène Gautier, Frédéric Bourgaud, et al.. (2009). Effects of Low Nitrogen Supply on Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Fruit Yield and Quality with Special Emphasis on Sugars, Acids, Ascorbate, Carotenoids, and Phenolic Compounds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 57(10). 4112–4123. 170 indexed citations

7.

Devaux, Marie‐Françoise, Abdellatif Barakat, Paul Robert, et al.. (2005). Mechanical breakdown and cell wall structure of mealy tomato pericarp tissue. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 37(3). 209–221. 45 indexed citations

8.

Navez, B., et al.. (2000). SENSORY EVALUATION OF CHARENTAIS-TYPE MELONS: AN EXPLORATORY TOOL. Acta Horticulturae. 487–498. 1 indexed citations

9.

Grasselly, Dominique, et al.. (2000). Tomato, for a quality product.. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact