Azucena Gracía

4.8k total citations
102 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

Azucena Gracía is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Azucena Gracía has authored 102 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 61 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 45 papers in Plant Science and 27 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management. Recurrent topics in Azucena Gracía's work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (47 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (39 papers) and Wine Industry and Tourism (27 papers). Azucena Gracía is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Environmental Valuation (47 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (39 papers) and Wine Industry and Tourism (27 papers). Azucena Gracía collaborates with scholars based in Spain, United States and Germany. Azucena Gracía's co-authors include Tiziana de‐Magistris, Jesús Barreiro‐Hurlé, Rodolfo M. Nayga, José María Gil Roig, María L. Loureiro, L. M. Albisu, Petjon Ballco, Luís Pérez y Pérez, Mercedes Sánchez and Ana Angulo and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Cleaner Production.

In The Last Decade

Azucena Gracía

96 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Azucena Gracía Spain 33 1.6k 1.3k 1.1k 1.0k 781 102 3.6k
Vincenzina Caputo United States 31 1.7k 1.0× 1.3k 1.0× 1.6k 1.4× 1.1k 1.1× 695 0.9× 76 4.2k
José María Gil Roig Spain 35 2.1k 1.3× 1.1k 0.9× 1.3k 1.2× 1.8k 1.8× 358 0.5× 281 5.3k
Riccardo Vecchio Italy 32 1.7k 1.0× 1.0k 0.8× 1.8k 1.6× 451 0.4× 874 1.1× 136 4.2k
Tiziana de‐Magistris Spain 25 1.2k 0.7× 1.0k 0.8× 806 0.7× 529 0.5× 544 0.7× 73 2.5k
Jill J. McCluskey United States 36 2.0k 1.2× 1.2k 0.9× 845 0.7× 1.7k 1.7× 483 0.6× 143 4.3k
Athanasios Krystallis Denmark 36 1.9k 1.2× 1.9k 1.4× 1.6k 1.4× 431 0.4× 505 0.6× 83 4.5k
Carola Grebitus United States 30 1.1k 0.7× 914 0.7× 644 0.6× 897 0.9× 305 0.4× 99 2.7k
Teresa Del Giudice Italy 26 1.2k 0.7× 928 0.7× 774 0.7× 515 0.5× 254 0.3× 99 2.7k
Wendy J. Umberger Australia 29 1.0k 0.6× 626 0.5× 1.0k 0.9× 1.1k 1.1× 380 0.5× 119 3.4k
Jutta Roosen Germany 37 1.2k 0.8× 952 0.7× 893 0.8× 1.2k 1.2× 654 0.8× 135 4.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Azucena Gracía

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Azucena Gracía's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Azucena Gracía with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Azucena Gracía more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Azucena Gracía

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Azucena Gracía. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Azucena Gracía. The network helps show where Azucena Gracía may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Azucena Gracía

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Azucena Gracía. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Azucena Gracía based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Azucena Gracía. Azucena Gracía is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gracía, Azucena, Miguel I. Gómez, & Petjon Ballco. (2025). Market Opportunities for Differentiated Locally Grown Fresh Produce: Understanding Consumer Preferences. Sustainability. 17(9). 3932–3932. 1 indexed citations
2.
Pérez, Luís Pérez y & Azucena Gracía. (2023). Consumer Preferences for Olive Oil in Spain: A Best-Worst Scaling Approach. Sustainability. 15(14). 11283–11283. 9 indexed citations
3.
Ballco, Petjon, Miguel I. Gómez, & Azucena Gracía. (2023). Consumers’ acceptability and sensory evaluation of a traditional local fresh potato variety. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 21(2). e0105–e0105. 2 indexed citations
5.
Gracía, Azucena, et al.. (2020). Making Use of Sustainable Local Plant Genetic Resources: Would Consumers Support the Recovery of a Traditional Purple Carrot?. Sustainability. 12(16). 6549–6549. 12 indexed citations
6.
Gracía, Azucena & Jesús Barreiro‐Hurlé. (2019). Making Sense of Information Overload: Consumer Ranking of Nutritional Claims in Cereal Based Products. Nutrients. 11(12). 2858–2858. 12 indexed citations
7.
Hodgkins, Charo, Bernadette Egan, Matthew Peacock, et al.. (2019). Understanding How Consumers Categorise Health Related Claims on Foods: A Consumer-Derived Typology of Health-Related Claims. Nutrients. 11(3). 539–539. 30 indexed citations
8.
Maza, María T., et al.. (2018). Consumers' valuation of two packaging aspects for fresh lamb meat: Vacuum and information labels. Packaging Technology and Science. 31(3). 123–132. 5 indexed citations
9.
de‐Magistris, Tiziana, Azucena Gracía, & Jesús Barreiro‐Hurlé. (2017). Do consumers care about European food labels? An empirical evaluation using best-worst method. British Food Journal. 119(12). 2698–2711. 51 indexed citations
10.
Hieke, Sophie, Igor Pravst, Krista Miklavec, et al.. (2016). Prevalence of Nutrition and Health-Related Claims on Pre-Packaged Foods: A Five-Country Study in Europe. Nutrients. 8(3). 137–137. 93 indexed citations
11.
Gracía, Azucena & Tiziana de‐Magistris. (2016). Consumer's willingness to pay for indigenous meat products: the case of a Spanish sheep breed.. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 14(2). 2. 3 indexed citations
12.
Gracía, Azucena & María T. Maza. (2015). Determinants of the intention to purchase an autochthonous local lamb breed: Spanish case study. Meat Science. 110. 212–219. 11 indexed citations
13.
Gracía, Azucena & Tiziana de‐Magistris. (2015). Consumer preferences for food labeling: What ranks first?. Food Control. 61. 39–46. 111 indexed citations
14.
Gracía, Azucena, et al.. (2013). Knowledge, environment or health? Investigating the factors that explain organic food consumption in Spain.. citaREA (Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón). 109(1). 86–106. 3 indexed citations
15.
Gracía, Azucena, et al.. (2011). Animal welfare concern and attitudes towards more animal welfare friendly meat products: characterization and segmentation.. 107(1). 33–47. 6 indexed citations
16.
de‐Magistris, Tiziana, et al.. (2011). Consumers Preferences for Wine in Spain: Best-Worst Scaling Methodology. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 3 indexed citations
17.
Gracía, Azucena, et al.. (2011). Willingness to pay for natural juice: a choice experiment approach.. 107(1). 21–32. 6 indexed citations
18.
Sánchez, Mercedes, José María Gil Roig, & Azucena Gracía. (2000). Segmentación del consumidor respecto al alimento ecológico: diferencias interregionales. Revista de estudios regionales. 153–164. 3 indexed citations
19.
Roig, José María Gil, et al.. (1999). El consumo de alimentos en la UE: una perspectiva regional. Distribución y consumo. 58–71. 2 indexed citations
20.
Sánchez, Mercedes, et al.. (1995). Evaluación del portencial de mercado de los productos de agricultura ecológica. QRU Quaderns de Recerca en Urbanisme. 2(1). 135. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026