Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Learning and Teaching Programming: A Review and Discussion
20031.1k citationsAnthony Robins, Janet Rountree et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Anthony Robins
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony Robins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony Robins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony Robins more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony Robins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony Robins. The network helps show where Anthony Robins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anthony Robins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anthony Robins.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anthony Robins based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anthony Robins. Anthony Robins is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lamb, Peter, Roger Bartlett, & Anthony Robins. (2010). Self-Organising Maps: An Objective Method for Clustering Complex Human Movement.. 9.20 indexed citations
11.
Lamb, Peter, et al.. (2008). Self-Organizing Maps as a Tool to Analyze Movement Variability.. 7.9 indexed citations
12.
Tolhurst, Denise, John Hamer, Ilona Box, et al.. (2006). Do map drawing styles of novice programmers predict success in programming?: a multi-national, multi-institutional study. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 52(5). 213–222.24 indexed citations
13.
Robins, Anthony, et al.. (2006). Problem distributions in a CS1 course. Australasian Computing Education Conference. 165–173.35 indexed citations
14.
Simon, Norma P., Quintin Cutts, Sally Fincher, et al.. (2006). The ability to articulate strategy as a predictor of programming skill. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 52(5). 181–188.21 indexed citations
15.
Simon, Norma P., Sally Fincher, Anthony Robins, et al.. (2006). Predictors of success in a first programming course. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 52(5). 189–196.84 indexed citations
16.
Haden, Patricia, et al.. (2005). My program is correct but it doesn't run: a preliminary investigation of novice programmers' problems. Australasian Computing Education Conference. 173–180.67 indexed citations
17.
Rountree, Janet, Nathan Rountree, Anthony Robins, & Robert Hannah. (2005). Observations of student competency in a CS1 course. Australasian Computing Education Conference. 145–149.6 indexed citations
Robins, Anthony & Marcus Frean. (1997). Learning and Generalisation in a Stable Network.. International Conference on Neural Information Processing. 314–317.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.