Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
BIOPEP-UWM Database of Bioactive Peptides: Current Opportunities
2019677 citationsPiotr Mińkiewicz, Anna Iwaniak et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Iwaniak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Iwaniak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Iwaniak more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Iwaniak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Iwaniak. The network helps show where Anna Iwaniak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Iwaniak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Iwaniak.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Iwaniak based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Iwaniak. Anna Iwaniak is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Iwaniak, Anna & J. Dziuba. (2011). BIOPEP-PBIL Tool for the Analysis of the Structure of Biologically Active Motifs Derived from Food Proteins. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.29 indexed citations
14.
Mińkiewicz, Piotr, et al.. (2009). Online Programs and Databases of Peptides and Proteolytic Enzymes – A Brief Update for 2007–2008. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.9 indexed citations
15.
Iwaniak, Anna & J. Dziuba. (2009). Animal and plant proteins as precursors of peptides with ACE inhibitory activity - an in silico strategy of protein evaluation.. Food Technology and Biotechnology. 47(4). 441–449.28 indexed citations
16.
Mińkiewicz, Piotr, J. Dziuba, Małgorzata Darewicz, et al.. (2008). Analiza peptida iz hrane. Food Technology and Biotechnology. 46(1). 1–10.36 indexed citations
17.
Iwaniak, Anna & Piotr Mińkiewicz. (2008). Biologically active peptides derived from proteins - a review.. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences. 58(3). 289–294.11 indexed citations
18.
Dziuba, Marta, J. Dziuba, & Anna Iwaniak. (2007). Bioinformatics-aided characteristics of the structural motifs of selected potentially celiac-toxic proteins of cereals and leguminous plants. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences. 57(4). 405–414.4 indexed citations
19.
Dziuba, J., Anna Iwaniak, & Piotr Mińkiewicz. (2003). Computer-aided characteristics of proteins as potential precursors of bioactive peptides SO POLIMERY. Polimery. 50–53.3 indexed citations
20.
Dziuba, J., et al.. (2002). Computer simulation of animal proteins proteolysis in the aspect of bioactive peptides obtaining. Polish Journal of Natural Science. 10.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.