This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Hill Duin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Hill Duin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Hill Duin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Hill Duin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Hill Duin. The network helps show where Ann Hill Duin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann Hill Duin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann Hill Duin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann Hill Duin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ann Hill Duin. Ann Hill Duin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Duin, Ann Hill, et al.. (2015). Change agent leadership. Planning for higher education. 43(3). 1–12.5 indexed citations
4.
Duin, Ann Hill, et al.. (2014). Retain Your Students: The Analytics, Policies and Politics of Reinvention Strategies. Planning for higher education. 42(3). 30.2 indexed citations
Duin, Ann Hill, et al.. (2011). Shared Leadership Transforms Higher Education IT.. The EDUCAUSE quarterly/EDUCAUSE quarterly. 34(2).2 indexed citations
7.
Duin, Ann Hill. (2011). Unlocking the Gates: How and Why Leading Universities Are Opening Up Access to Their Courses. Planning for higher education. 39(4). 66.8 indexed citations
8.
Duin, Ann Hill, et al.. (2010). Shared Leadership for a Green, Global, and Google World. Planning for higher education. 39(1). 30–38.1 indexed citations
9.
Whiteside, Aimee L., et al.. (2009). Using the PAIR-up Model to Evaluate Active Learning Spaces.. The EDUCAUSE quarterly/EDUCAUSE quarterly. 32(1).21 indexed citations
10.
Duin, Ann Hill, et al.. (2002). Moving Forward with Distance Education.. 35(11). 18–23.2 indexed citations
11.
Duin, Ann Hill, et al.. (2001). Partnering in the Learning Marketspace. Jossey-Bass eBooks.7 indexed citations
Duin, Ann Hill, et al.. (1996). Collaboration via E-Mail and Internet Relay Chat: Understanding Time and Technology.. Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication. 43(4). 402–412.18 indexed citations
14.
Duin, Ann Hill. (1994). Structuring Distance-Meeting Environments.. Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication. 41(4). 695–708.3 indexed citations
15.
Duin, Ann Hill. (1990). Computer documentation—centering on the learner. The Journal of Computer Based Instruction. 17(2). 73–78.2 indexed citations
16.
Duin, Ann Hill, et al.. (1989). Applying a Cognitive Model to Document Cycling.. 16(3).2 indexed citations
17.
Duin, Ann Hill. (1988). How People Read: Implications for Writers.. 15(3).3 indexed citations
18.
Duin, Ann Hill. (1988). Computer-assisted instructional displays: effect on students' computing behaviors, prewriting, and attitudes. The Journal of Computer Based Instruction. 15(2). 48–56.9 indexed citations
19.
Duin, Ann Hill & Michael F. Graves. (1986). Effects of Vocabulary Instruction Used as a Prewriting Technique.. Journal of research and development in education. 20(1). 7–13.15 indexed citations
20.
Graves, Michael F. & Ann Hill Duin. (1985). Building Students' Expressive Vocabularies.. 23(1). 4–10.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.