Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The gender composition of corporate boards: A review and research agenda
This map shows the geographic impact of Anja Kirsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anja Kirsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anja Kirsch more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anja Kirsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anja Kirsch. The network helps show where Anja Kirsch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anja Kirsch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anja Kirsch.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anja Kirsch based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anja Kirsch. Anja Kirsch is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kirsch, Anja. (2017). The gender composition of corporate boards: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly. 29(2). 346–364.365 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Holst, Elke & Anja Kirsch. (2016). Finanzsektor: Frauenanteile in Spitzengremien nehmen etwas zu - Männer geben den Ton an. Econstor (Econstor). 83(2). 46–57.1 indexed citations
7.
Holst, Elke & Anja Kirsch. (2016). Financial sector: Share of women on corporate boards increases slightly but men still call the shots. Econstor (Econstor). 6(3). 27–38.2 indexed citations
8.
Holst, Elke & Anja Kirsch. (2016). Corporate boards of large companies: More momentum needed for gender parity. Econstor (Econstor). 6(3). 13–25.8 indexed citations
9.
Holst, Elke & Anja Kirsch. (2016). Spitzengremien großer Unternehmen: Mehr Schubkraft für eine ausgewogene Repräsentation von Frauen und Männern nötig. Econstor (Econstor). 83(2). 31–44.1 indexed citations
10.
Holst, Elke & Anja Kirsch. (2015). Weiterhin kaum Frauen in den Vorständen großer Unternehmen: Auch Aufsichtsräte bleiben Männerdomänen. DIW Wochenbericht. 82(4). 47–60.3 indexed citations
11.
Holst, Elke & Anja Kirsch. (2015). Financial Sector: Share of Women in Top Decision-Making Bodies Remains Low. Econstor (Econstor). 5(4). 49–58.1 indexed citations
Holst, Elke & Anja Kirsch. (2014). Finanzsektor: Verbesserungen beim Frauenanteil in Spitzengremien allenfalls in Trippelschritten. Econstor (Econstor). 81(3). 33–41.1 indexed citations
14.
Holst, Elke & Anja Kirsch. (2014). Financial sector: Upward trend in share of women on corporate boards progressing only in small steps. Econstor (Econstor). 4(3). 17–25.1 indexed citations
15.
Holst, Elke & Anja Kirsch. (2014). Women still the exception on executive boards of Germany's large firms: Gradually increasing representation on supervisory boards. Econstor (Econstor). 4(3). 3–15.7 indexed citations
16.
Holst, Elke & Anja Kirsch. (2014). Frauen sind in Vorständen großer Unternehmen in Deutschland noch immer die Ausnahme: Moderat steigende Anteile in Aufsichtsräten. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 81(3). 19–31.3 indexed citations
17.
Holst, Elke & Anja Kirsch. (2014). Executive board and supervisory board members in Germany's large corporations remain predominantly male. Econstor (Econstor). 5(4). 35–47.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.