Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Education Culture, Economy, and Society
1998851 citationsJan Ö. Jönsson, Hugh Lauder et al.British Journal of Sociologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Amy Stuart Wells
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Stuart Wells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Stuart Wells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Stuart Wells more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Stuart Wells
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Stuart Wells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Stuart Wells. The network helps show where Amy Stuart Wells may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy Stuart Wells
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy Stuart Wells.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy Stuart Wells based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Amy Stuart Wells. Amy Stuart Wells is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wells, Amy Stuart. (2015). Diverse Housing, Diverse Schooling: How Policy Can Stabilize Racial Demographic Change in Cities and Suburbs.. CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder).8 indexed citations
3.
Wells, Amy Stuart, et al.. (2009). Both Sides Now The Story of School Desegregations Graduates. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).27 indexed citations
Wells, Amy Stuart. (2002). Where charter school policy fails : the problems of accountability and equity. Teachers College Press eBooks.96 indexed citations
Wells, Amy Stuart. (2001). The "Consequences" of School Desegregation: The Mismatch Between the Research and the Rationale. Hastings constitutional law quarterly. 28(4). 771–797.19 indexed citations
10.
Wells, Amy Stuart. (1999). California's Charter Schools: Promises v. Performance.. The American Educator. 23(1). 18.1 indexed citations
11.
Wells, Amy Stuart. (1998). Charter School Reform in California: Does It Meet Objectives?.. Phi Delta Kappan. 80(4).2 indexed citations
12.
Oakes, Jeannie & Amy Stuart Wells. (1998). Detracking for High Student Achievement.. Educational leadership. 55(6). 38–41.40 indexed citations
13.
Wells, Amy Stuart. (1998). Charter School Reform in California: Does It Meet Expectations?. Phi Delta Kappan. 80(4). 305.22 indexed citations
Jönsson, Jan Ö., et al.. (1998). Education Culture, Economy, and Society. British Journal of Sociology. 49(2). 321–321.851 indexed citations breakdown →
Wells, Amy Stuart, et al.. (1994). The Importance of Understanding the Social, Political and Historical Context of Education Reform: How Much Is Enough?.. Ginekologia Polska. 68(12). 573–87.1 indexed citations
Wells, Amy Stuart. (1993). Time to Choose: America at the Crossroads of School Choice Policy.100 indexed citations
20.
Wells, Amy Stuart. (1989). Middle School Education--The Critical Link in Dropout Prevention. ERIC/CUE Digest No. 56..1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.