Scott Wright

2.6k total citations
50 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Scott Wright is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Scott Wright has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Communication, 19 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 16 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Scott Wright's work include Social Media and Politics (39 papers), Media Studies and Communication (13 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (9 papers). Scott Wright is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (39 papers), Media Studies and Communication (13 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (9 papers). Scott Wright collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Scott Wright's co-authors include John Street, Todd Graham, Verity Trott, Callum Jones, Daniel Jackson, Stephen Coleman, Andrea Carson, Ruth Wodak, Pablo Jost and David Nolan and has published in prestigious journals such as New Media & Society, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication and Information Communication & Society.

In The Last Decade

Scott Wright

48 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Scott Wright Australia	21	1.1k	629	475	316	219	50	1.6k
Paolo Gerbaudo United Kingdom	19	1.2k 1.1×	1.1k 1.7×	756 1.6×	300 0.9×	306 1.4×	47	2.2k
Lincoln Dahlberg Australia	19	1.6k 1.4×	920 1.5×	630 1.3×	313 1.0×	156 0.7×	30	2.1k
Todd Graham Netherlands	15	1.4k 1.2×	638 1.0×	331 0.7×	240 0.8×	200 0.9×	28	1.7k
Daniel Kreiss United States	21	1.4k 1.2×	882 1.4×	510 1.1×	321 1.0×	177 0.8×	63	1.9k
Jennifer Stromer‐Galley United States	24	1.7k 1.5×	1.1k 1.7×	631 1.3×	445 1.4×	171 0.8×	78	2.4k
Gunn Enli Norway	18	1.4k 1.2×	908 1.4×	406 0.9×	178 0.6×	222 1.0×	44	2.0k
Hallvard Moe Norway	23	1.4k 1.2×	964 1.5×	300 0.6×	218 0.7×	126 0.6×	77	2.1k
Kate Kenski United States	19	1.8k 1.6×	1.3k 2.1×	527 1.1×	640 2.0×	317 1.4×	74	2.5k
Patrick J. Kenney United States	26	928 0.8×	991 1.6×	1.3k 2.7×	154 0.5×	474 2.2×	69	2.2k
Andrea Cerón Italy	20	715 0.6×	677 1.1×	630 1.3×	351 1.1×	106 0.5×	65	1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Wright

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Wright

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Wright. The network helps show where Scott Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott Wright. Scott Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Carson, Andrea & Scott Wright. (2022). Fake news and democracy: definitions, impact and response. Australian Journal of Political Science. 57(3). 221–230. 5 indexed citations

Wright, Scott, et al.. (2020). Election Night Broadcasts and the Hybrid Media System: A Case Study of Australia. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 27(1). 38–57. 3 indexed citations

Wright, Scott, Verity Trott, & Callum Jones. (2020). ‘The pussy ain’t worth it, bro’: assessing the discourse and structure of MGTOW. Information Communication & Society. 23(6). 908–925. 40 indexed citations

Carson, Andrea, et al.. (2020). Weaponizing Fake News: An Examination of Political Elites and the Discourse of Fake News. Figshare. 1 indexed citations

Wright, Scott, et al.. (2019). Delineating and Assessing Cultural Relations: The Case of Asialink. International journal of communication. 13. 20. 1 indexed citations

Wright, Scott, Daniel Jackson, & Todd Graham. (2019). When Journalists Go “Below the Line”: Comment Spaces at The Guardian (2006–2017). Journalism Studies. 21(1). 107–126. 14 indexed citations

Chisolm, Margaret S., Amin Azzam, Manasa S. Ayyala, Rachel B. Levine, & Scott Wright. (2018). What’s a book club doing at a medical conference?. MedEdPublish. 7. 146–146. 7 indexed citations

Wright, Scott, et al.. (2018). The Evolution of Data Journalism: A Case Study of Australia. Journalism Studies. 20(13). 1811–1827. 26 indexed citations

Wright, Scott, et al.. (2017). Generating a voice among ‘media monsters’: hybrid media practices of Taiwan’s Anti-Media Monopoly Movement. Australian Journal of Political Science. 53(1). 89–102. 3 indexed citations

10.

Wright, Scott, Todd Graham, & Daniel Jackson. (2017). Third Space and Everyday Online Political Talk: Deliberation, Polarisation, Avoidance. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 5 indexed citations

11.

Ziegele, Marc, Nina Springer, Pablo Jost, & Scott Wright. (2017). Online user comments across news and other content formats: Multidisciplinary perspectives, new directions. Studies in Communication and Media. 6(4). 315–332. 38 indexed citations

12.

Wright, Scott, et al.. (2016). Analysing Everyday Online Political Talk in China: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 49(1). 41–61. 2 indexed citations

13.

Wright, Scott, et al.. (2016). The role of the family in resettlement. University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford). 1 indexed citations

14.

Wright, Scott. (2015). Populism and Downing Street E-petitions: Connective Action, Hybridity, and the Changing Nature of Organizing. Political Communication. 32(3). 414–433. 42 indexed citations

15.

Wright, Scott. (2015). ‘Success’ and online political participation: The case of Downing Street E-petitions. Information Communication & Society. 19(6). 843–857. 40 indexed citations

16.

Wright, Scott, et al.. (2014). Young people and resettlement: participatory approaches: a practitioner’s guide. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository). 1 indexed citations

17.

Graham, Todd & Scott Wright. (2013). Discursive Equality and Everyday Talk Online: The Impact of “Superparticipants”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 19(3). 625–642. 118 indexed citations

18.

Wright, Scott. (2012). From “Third Place” to “Third Space”: Everyday Political Talk in Non-Political Online Spaces. Javnost - The Public. 19(3). 5–20. 91 indexed citations

19.

Wright, Scott. (2010). The Internet and Democratic Citizenship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(11). 2374–2375. 4 indexed citations

20.

Wright, Scott. (2002). Dogma or Dialogue? The Politics of the Downing Street Website. Politics. 22(3). 135–142. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact