Nicholas J. Schork

72.4k citations
469 papers · 35.8k · 11 hit papers · h-index 96

Impact in

  • Aging top 0.2%
  • Genetics top 0.02%
    • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
    • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
    • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
    • Genomics and Rare Diseases
    • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Papers in

    • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 102
    • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals 54
    • Genomics and Rare Diseases 26
    • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock 25
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks 32
    • Gene expression and cancer classification 24
    • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 24
    • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 24

Nicholas J. Schork

461 papers receiving 34.3k citations

Nicholas J. Schork's Hit Papers

Artificial Intelligence and Personalized Medicine 2019 · 333 citations
3330+10+21Years since publication50010001.5k2.0k2.5k

Peers

Nicholas J. Schork
Comparison fields: 5 of 221
  • Aging 722
  • Genetics 10.5k
  • Biological Psychiatry 431
  • Health Informatics 236
  • Molecular Biology 10.7k
Replace M Snyder with:
M Snyder United States
Tim D. Spector United Kingdom
Francis S. Collins United States
Eric E. Schadt United States
Mark J. Daly United States
Benjamin M. Neale United States
Aldons J. Lusis United States
Håkon Håkonarson United States
David B. Allison United States
John Danesh United Kingdom
Nicholas J. Schork relative to M Snyder United States M Snyder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M Snyder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas J. Schork

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas J. Schork's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas J. Schork with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas J. Schork more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas J. Schork

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas J. Schork. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas J. Schork. The network helps show where Nicholas J. Schork may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas J. Schork, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas J. Schork Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas J. Schork links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 469 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Genetic Dissection of Complex Traits
Hit paper breakdown →
19942821
2
Gut Microbiome-Based Metagenomic Signature for Non-invasive Detection of Advanced Fibrosis in Human Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Hit paper breakdown →
2017877
3
Personalized medicine: Time for one-person trials
Hit paper breakdown →
2015829
4
Human genetic variation and its contribution to complex traits
Hit paper breakdown →
2009757
5
Histopathology of Pediatric Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease * #
Hit paper breakdown →
2005609
6
Personalized medicine: motivation, challenges, and progress
Hit paper breakdown →
2018566
7
Transgenerational Epigenetic Instability Is a Source of Novel Methylation Variants
Hit paper breakdown →
2011520
8
The N-Of-1 Clinical Trial: The Ultimate Strategy For Individualizing Medicine?
Hit paper breakdown →
2011495
9
Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies
Hit paper breakdown →
2009477
10 2009461
11 1999445
12 2005444
13 2010442
14
Patterns of population epigenomic diversity
Hit paper breakdown →
2013428
15 2011398
16 2009369
17 2001352
18 2000350
19 2010344
20 2006340

About Nicholas J. Schork

Nicholas J. Schork is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 469 papers that have together received 35.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (102 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (54 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (32 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (26 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (25 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (24 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (24 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (722 citations), Genetics (10.5k citations), Biological Psychiatry (431 citations), Health Informatics (236 citations) and Molecular Biology (10.7k citations). Nicholas J. Schork has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eric S. Lander, Eric J. Topol, Ali Torkamani, Sarah S. Murray, Kelly A. Frazer, Laura H. Goetz, Cinnamon S. Bloss, Ondrej Libiger, Caroline M. Nievergelt and Aditya K. Gupta. Their work appears in journals such as Hypertension, The American Journal of Human Genetics, PLoS Genetics, Frontiers in Genetics and American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact