Candice C. Wong

15 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Candice C. Wong
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 174
  • General Health Professions 102
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 59
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 59
  • Economics and Econometrics 58
Replace Nasim Afsarmanesh with:
Nasim Afsarmanesh United States
Lawrence So Canada
J. Knapp Australia
Fredric J. Romm United States
Canopy Roychoudhury United States
Meghan Knoedler United States
Heidi Mochari United States
Marilyn A. Prasun United States
Jan Radford Australia
Tjerk Wiersma Netherlands
Candice C. Wong relative to Nasim Afsarmanesh United States Nasim Afsarmanesh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Nasim Afsarmanesh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Candice C. Wong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Candice C. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Candice C. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Candice C. Wong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Candice C. Wong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Candice C. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Candice C. Wong. The network helps show where Candice C. Wong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Candice C. Wong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Candice C. Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Candice C. Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Candice C. Wong. Candice C. Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 19
3 4
4 32
5
Work time and 11-year progression of carotid atherosclerosis in middle-aged Finnish men.
14
6 24
7
Engaging community in the quality of hypertension care project with Hmong Americans.
6
8 4
9 24
10 12
11 43
12 11
13 9
14
Influence of gender on cardiovascular mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients with high indication for coronary angiography.
27
15 143

About Candice C. Wong

Candice C. Wong is a scholar working on Family Practice, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (4 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (174 citations), Family Practice (14 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (17 citations). Candice C. Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Lundstrom, Hal V. Barron, Bix E. Swain, Joe V. Selby, Erika Sivarajan Froelicher, Bruce Fireman, Mark A. Hlatky, Elisa K. Tong, Janice Y. Tsoh and Alison Truman. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The American Journal of Cardiology and American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026