This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Barnes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Barnes. The network helps show where Alison Barnes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alison Barnes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alison Barnes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alison Barnes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alison Barnes. Alison Barnes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Barnes, Alison, John D. Graham, & David M. Konisky. (2021). Fifty Years at the US Environmental Protection Agency: Progress, Retrenchment, and Opportunities. eYLS (Yale Law School).4 indexed citations
Barnes, Alison & George Lafferty. (2010). The Fair Work Act: As Good as it Gets?. The Economic and Labour Relations Review. 21(1). 1–12.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.