Countries citing papers authored by George Lafferty
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of George Lafferty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Lafferty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Lafferty more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Lafferty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Lafferty. The network helps show where George Lafferty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Lafferty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Lafferty.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Lafferty based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with George Lafferty. George Lafferty is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lafferty, George, et al.. (2018). Earnings Management During the Oil Price Crisis. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
2.
Lafferty, George. (2016). Opening the learning process: The potential role of feature film in teaching employment relations. Australian Journal of Adult Learning. 56(1). 8–28.3 indexed citations
Lafferty, George, et al.. (2013). Monitoring the implied promise: Promotion to partnership in large UK law firms. 19(1). 4.1 indexed citations
6.
Barnes, Alison & George Lafferty. (2010). The Fair Work Act: As Good as it Gets?. The Economic and Labour Relations Review. 21(1). 1–12.3 indexed citations
7.
Allan, Cameron, George Lafferty, & John Burgess. (2007). University Restructuring and Teaching Quality. 32(2). 87.1 indexed citations
Pinnington, Ashly & George Lafferty. (2003). Human resource management in Australia. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).21 indexed citations
10.
Lafferty, George, et al.. (2003). Dealing with maturity: Strategies to address the problem of stagnation in tourism destinations.1 indexed citations
11.
Roan, Amanda, George Lafferty, & Rebecca Loudoun. (2002). Survivors and victims: a case study of organisational restructuring in the public health sector. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 27(2). 151–168.3 indexed citations
12.
Whitehouse, Gillian, Chris Diamond, & George Lafferty. (2002). Assessing the Benefits of Telework: Australian Case Study Evidence. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 27(3). 257–268.20 indexed citations
13.
Fleming, Jenny & George Lafferty. (2001). Police Unions, Industrial Strategies and Political Influence: Some Recent History. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 9(2). 131–140.6 indexed citations
Lafferty, George & Gillian Whitehouse. (2000). Telework in Australia: Findings from a national survey in selected industries. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 26(3). 236–252.9 indexed citations
Lafferty, George, Richard Hall, Bill Harley, & Gillian Whitehouse. (1997). Homeworking in Australia: An Assessment of Current Trends.. Australian bulletin of labour. 23(4).8 indexed citations
20.
Lafferty, George. (1996). Equity, Access and Independent Learning: Maximising the Outcomes for Mature Age Students.. 36(2).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.