Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta‐analysis
2014503 citationsAlexander Chernev, Ulf Böckenholt et al.Journal of Consumer Psychologyprofile →
Doing Well by Doing Good: The Benevolent Halo of Corporate Social Responsibility
2015474 citationsAlexander Chernev, Sean BlairJournal of Consumer Researchprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Alexander Chernev Alexander Chernev (= 1×)
peers
Julie R. Irwin
Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Chernev
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Chernev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Chernev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Chernev more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Chernev
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Chernev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Chernev. The network helps show where Alexander Chernev may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander Chernev
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander Chernev.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander Chernev based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander Chernev. Alexander Chernev is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Chernev, Alexander & Sean Blair. (2015). Doing Well by Doing Good: The Benevolent Halo of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Consumer Research. 41(6). 1412–1425.474 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Chernev, Alexander. (2012). Customers will pay more for less. Harvard business review. 90(6).2 indexed citations
Chernev, Alexander. (2010). The Dieter's Paradox. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 21(2). 178–183.154 indexed citations
9.
Chernev, Alexander & David Gal. (2009). Brand Saturation in Consumer Choice. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
10.
Chernev, Alexander. (2009). The Marketing Plan Handbook.9 indexed citations
11.
Brough, Aaron R., Mathew S. Isaac, & Alexander Chernev. (2008). The “Sticky Choice” Bias in Sequential Decision-Making. ACR North American Advances.2 indexed citations
12.
Chernev, Alexander & Ryan Hamilton. (2008). Assortment Size and Option Attractiveness in Consumer Choice among Retailers.1 indexed citations
13.
Chernev, Alexander & Ryan Hamilton. (2007). "Too Much of a Good Thing? Option Attractiveness and Assortment Choice". ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Chernev, Alexander & Ran Kivetz. (2005). Special Session Summary Goals and Mindsets in Consumer Choice. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
17.
Chernev, Alexander. (2004). Goal–Attribute Compatibility in Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 14. 141–150.189 indexed citations
18.
Chernev, Alexander & S. Christian Wheeler. (2003). Special Session Summary the Role of Reference Points in Evaluating Price Information. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Chernev, Alexander & Ziv Carmon. (1996). Special Session Summary New Perspectives on Brand Differentiation. ACR North American Advances.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.