Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Fish gelatin: properties, challenges, and prospects as an alternative to mammalian gelatins
This map shows the geographic impact of A.A. Karim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.A. Karim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.A. Karim more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.A. Karim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.A. Karim. The network helps show where A.A. Karim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A.A. Karim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A.A. Karim.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A.A. Karim based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A.A. Karim. A.A. Karim is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ahmad, Rosma, et al.. (2015). Functional properties of resistant starch type-III from Metroxylon sagu as affected by processing conditions.. Pertanika journal of tropical agricultural science. 38(3). 399–412.7 indexed citations
Bhat, Rajeev, et al.. (2014). Preliminary studies on the evaluation of nutritional composition of unripe and ripe 'Kundang' fruits (Bouea macrophylla Griffith).. International Food Research Journal. 21(3). 949–954.13 indexed citations
10.
Bhat, Rajeev, et al.. (2013). Composition of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa) and Chinese apple flower (Malus spp.) buds.. International Food Research Journal. 20(3). 1173–1179.5 indexed citations
11.
Karim, A.A., et al.. (2013). Extraction and characterization of pepsin-solubilized collagen from the body wall of crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster planci).. International Food Research Journal. 20(6). 3013–3020.16 indexed citations
12.
Ahmad, Rosma, et al.. (2012). Fermentation of black tea broth (Kombucha): I. Effects of sucrose concentration and fermentation time on the yield of microbial cellulose. International Food Research Journal. 19(1). 109–117.108 indexed citations
13.
Fazilah, A., et al.. (2012). The effects of UV treatment on the properties of sago and mung bean films.. International Food Research Journal. 19(1). 265–270.5 indexed citations
14.
Ahmad, Rosma, et al.. (2012). Microstructure and physical properties of microbial cellulose produced during fermentation of black tea broth (Kombucha). II.. International Food Research Journal. 19(1). 153–158.55 indexed citations
Karim, A.A., et al.. (2001). Preparation of Granular Cold Water-Soluble Sago Starch: A Preliminary Study. 9(2). 60.1 indexed citations
20.
Islam, MS, et al.. (1985). The effect of low dose irradiation on the physicochemical changes of potatoes during storage. 10(4). 31–40.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.