Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Job Demand-Control (-Support) Model and psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research
19991.5k citationsMargot van der Doef, Stan MaesWork & Stressprofile →
Determinants and prevalence of burnout in emergency nurses: A systematic review of 25 years of research
2014549 citationsJef Adriaenssens, Véronique De Gucht et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Stan Maes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stan Maes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stan Maes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stan Maes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stan Maes. The network helps show where Stan Maes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stan Maes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stan Maes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stan Maes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stan Maes. Stan Maes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Adrian, Tobias, Michael Chui, Daniel Fricke, et al.. (2018). Shadow Banking: Financial Intermediation beyond Banks. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Gucht, Véronique De, et al.. (2015). Determinants of methotrexate adherence in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 74. 1336–1336.1 indexed citations
Doef, Margot van der, et al.. (2014). Relationships Between Quality of Work, Burnout, and Quality of Care in Health Care. European Health Psychologist. 16. 298.1 indexed citations
6.
Maes, Stan. (2013). Quality of life of patients and health care professionals. European Health Psychologist. 15(2). 48–52.1 indexed citations
Boersma, Sandra N. & Stan Maes. (2006). Psychological consequences of myocardial infarction: a self-regulation perspective on health-related quality of life and cardiac rehabilitation.. PubMed Central. 14(10). 335–338.3 indexed citations
Maes, Stan, et al.. (1992). International Review of Health Psychology. John Wiley & Sons eBooks.145 indexed citations
20.
Maes, Stan. (1988). Topics in health psychology. Wiley eBooks.126 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.