Anxiety Stress & Coping

1.2k papers and 38.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Anxiety Stress & Coping in the last decades have received a total of 38.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Anxiety Stress & Coping usually cover Clinical Psychology (702 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (449 papers) and Social Psychology (409 papers) specifically the topics of Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (331 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (278 papers) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (179 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anxiety Stress & Coping are Vimala Veeraraghavan, Susan Folkman, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Arnold B. Bakker, Peter J. Norton, Ralf Schwarzer, Michael P. Leiter, Esther R. Greenglass, Marisa Salanova and Ronald J. Burke.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anxiety Stress & Coping

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anxiety Stress & Coping. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anxiety Stress & Coping.

Countries where authors publish in Anxiety Stress & Coping

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anxiety Stress & Coping. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anxiety Stress & Coping with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anxiety Stress & Coping more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025