Review of Research in Education

727 papers and 38.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 727 papers published in Review of Research in Education in the last decades have received a total of 38.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Research in Education usually cover Education (420 papers), Sociology and Political Science (178 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (104 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (105 papers), School Choice and Performance (81 papers) and Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Research in Education are James Paul Gee, Gary D. Fenstermacher, Marilyn Cochran‐Smith, Susan L. Lytle, James A. Banks, William F. Tate, Daniel L. Schwartz, John D. Bransford, Gene V. Glass and Richard A. Duschl.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Research in Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Research in Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Research in Education.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Research in Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Research in Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Research in Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Research in Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025