William F. Tate
- Education top 0.1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.2%
- Safety Research top 1%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Co-authors
- Gloria Ladson‐BillingsMark C. HogrebeCarl A. GrantAlfredo J. ArtilesJanette K. KlingnerBeth HarryElizabeth B. KozleskiDavid Riley
- Topics
- School Choice and Performance (16 papers)Critical Race Theory in Education (9 papers)Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican Educational Research JournalEducational Researcher
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorth Macedonia
In The Last Decade
William F. Tate
48 papers receiving 4.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Education 3.9k
- Sociology and Political Science 3.0k
- Safety Research 418
- Social Psychology 353
- Gender Studies 254
Countries citing papers authored by William F. Tate
This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Tate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Tate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Tate more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William F. Tate
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Tate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Tate. The network helps show where William F. Tate may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William F. Tate
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William F. Tate. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William F. Tate based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William F. Tate. William F. Tate is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 172 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 115 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 424 | |
| 15 | 428 | |
| 16 | 58 | |
| 17 | Toward a Critical Race Theory of Educationbreakdown → | 2251 |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | Race, Retrenchment, and the Reform of School Mathematics | 99 |
| 20 | Advocacy versus Economics: A Critical Race Analysis of the Proposed National Assessment in Mathematics. | 12 |
About William F. Tate
William F. Tate is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 50 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include School Choice and Performance (16 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (9 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (3.9k citations), Sociology and Political Science (3.0k citations) and Safety Research (418 citations). William F. Tate has collaborated with scholars based in United States and North Macedonia. Frequent co-authors include Gloria Ladson‐Billings, Mark C. Hogrebe, Carl A. Grant, Alfredo J. Artiles, Janette K. Klingner, Beth Harry, Elizabeth B. Kozleski, David Riley, Grace Zamora Durán and Shelley Zion. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Educational Research Journal and Educational Researcher.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.