William F. Tate

11.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
50 papers, 4.9k citations indexed

About

William F. Tate is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, William F. Tate has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 4.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Education, 17 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in William F. Tate's work include School Choice and Performance (16 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (9 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (7 papers). William F. Tate is often cited by papers focused on School Choice and Performance (16 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (9 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (7 papers). William F. Tate collaborates with scholars based in United States and North Macedonia. William F. Tate's co-authors include Gloria Ladson‐Billings, Mark C. Hogrebe, Carl A. Grant, Alfredo J. Artiles, Janette K. Klingner, Elizabeth B. Kozleski, Grace Zamora Durán, David Riley, Beth Harry and Shelley Zion and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Educational Research Journal and Educational Researcher.

In The Last Decade

William F. Tate

48 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Hit Papers

Toward a Critical Race Th... 1995 2026 2005 2015 1995 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William F. Tate United States 22 3.9k 3.0k 418 353 254 50 4.9k
H. Richard Milner United States 36 4.2k 1.1× 2.9k 1.0× 496 1.2× 387 1.1× 201 0.8× 87 5.2k
Signithia Fordham United States 9 2.6k 0.7× 2.3k 0.8× 485 1.2× 400 1.1× 282 1.1× 18 3.9k
Geneva Gay United States 22 3.5k 0.9× 1.6k 0.5× 256 0.6× 308 0.9× 108 0.4× 38 4.3k
Christine E. Sleeter United States 40 6.6k 1.7× 4.0k 1.3× 415 1.0× 365 1.0× 195 0.8× 129 7.9k
Tyrone C. Howard United States 28 2.6k 0.7× 1.5k 0.5× 313 0.7× 303 0.9× 174 0.7× 54 3.1k
Carl A. Grant United States 30 3.0k 0.8× 1.6k 0.5× 144 0.3× 210 0.6× 133 0.5× 125 3.7k
James Joseph Scheurich United States 25 2.4k 0.6× 1.2k 0.4× 184 0.4× 229 0.6× 202 0.8× 82 3.1k
Alan R. Sadovnik United States 12 2.2k 0.6× 1.4k 0.5× 188 0.4× 161 0.5× 132 0.5× 35 3.2k
Zeus Leonardo United States 22 2.3k 0.6× 2.4k 0.8× 211 0.5× 276 0.8× 218 0.9× 55 3.3k
Jean Anyon United States 21 2.8k 0.7× 1.9k 0.6× 175 0.4× 116 0.3× 161 0.6× 41 3.7k

Countries citing papers authored by William F. Tate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Tate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Tate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Tate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William F. Tate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Tate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Tate. The network helps show where William F. Tate may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William F. Tate

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William F. Tate. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William F. Tate based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William F. Tate. William F. Tate is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hogrebe, Mark C. & William F. Tate. (2019). Residential Segregation Across Metro St. Louis School Districts: Examining the Intersection of Two Spatial Dimensions. AERA Open. 5(1). 8 indexed citations
2.
Tate, William F., et al.. (2018). 2018 -- "SUM" is Better than Nothing: Toward a Sociology of Urban Mathematics Education. 11(1-2). 2 indexed citations
3.
Tate, William F.. (2018). 2008 -- Putting the "Urban" in Mathematics Education Scholarship. 11(1-2). 2 indexed citations
4.
Plunk, Andrew D., Arpana Agrawal, Paul T. Harrell, et al.. (2016). The impact of adolescent exposure to medical marijuana laws on high school completion, college enrollment and college degree completion. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 168. 320–327. 11 indexed citations
5.
Tate, William F., et al.. (2015). Ferguson and Beyond: A Descriptive Epidemiological Study Using Geospatial Analysis. The Journal of Negro Education. 84(3). 231–231. 11 indexed citations
6.
Tate, William F. & Mark C. Hogrebe. (2011). From visuals to vision: using GIS to inform civic dialogue about African American males. Race Ethnicity and Education. 14(1). 51–71. 23 indexed citations
7.
Hogrebe, Mark C. & William F. Tate. (2010). School Composition and Context Factors that Moderate and Predict 10th-Grade Science Proficiency. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 112(4). 1096–1136. 27 indexed citations
8.
Tate, William F.. (2008). Putting the "Urban" in Mathematics Education Scholarship. 1(1). 14 indexed citations
9.
Tate, William F.. (2008). “Geography of Opportunity”: Poverty, Place, and Educational Outcomes. Educational Researcher. 37(7). 397–411. 177 indexed citations
10.
Artiles, Alfredo J., Janette K. Klingner, & William F. Tate. (2006). Representation of Minority Students in Special Education: Complicating Traditional Explanations. Educational Researcher. 35(6). 3–5. 36 indexed citations
11.
Tate, William F.. (2004). Chapter 5:Brown, Political Economy, and the Scientific Education of African Americans. Review of Research in Education. 28(1). 147–184. 9 indexed citations
12.
Tate, William F., et al.. (2003). No Time Like the Present: Reflecting on Equity in School Mathematics. Theory Into Practice. 42(3). 210–216. 63 indexed citations
13.
Tate, William F.. (2003). The "race" to theorize education: Who is my neighbor?. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 16(1). 121–126. 14 indexed citations
14.
Tate, William F.. (2001). Science education as a civil right: Urban schools and opportunity‐to‐learn considerations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 38(9). 1015–1028. 115 indexed citations
15.
Tate, William F.. (1997). Chapter 4: Critical Race Theory and Education: History, Theory, and Implications. Review of Research in Education. 22(1). 195–247. 424 indexed citations
16.
Tate, William F.. (1997). Critical Race Theory and Education: History, Theory, and Implications. Review of Research in Education. 22. 195–195. 428 indexed citations
17.
Ladson‐Billings, Gloria & William F. Tate. (1995). Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 97(1). 47–68. 2251 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Tate, William F.. (1995). School Mathematics and African American Students: Thinking Seriously about Opportunity-to-Learn Standards. Educational Administration Quarterly. 31(3). 424–448. 58 indexed citations
19.
Tate, William F.. (1994). Race, Retrenchment, and the Reform of School Mathematics. Phi Delta Kappan. 75(6). 477. 99 indexed citations
20.
Tate, William F.. (1993). Advocacy versus Economics: A Critical Race Analysis of the Proposed National Assessment in Mathematics.. 19. 16–22. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026