Countries where authors publish in Financial Management
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Financial Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Financial Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Financial Management more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Financial Management
This network shows the impact of papers published in Financial Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Financial Management.
About Financial Management
The 1.8k papers published in Financial Management in the last decades have received a total of 70.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Financial Management usually cover Finance (1.0k papers), Accounting (1.1k papers), Strategy and Management (490 papers), Economics and Econometrics (455 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (83 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (925 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (650 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (415 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (374 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (230 papers), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (159 papers), Housing Market and Economics (125 papers) and Private Equity and Venture Capital (116 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Financial Management are Michael S. Weisbach, Vidhan K. Goyal, Murray Z. Frank, Benjamin E. Hermalin, J.B. Heaton, Tim Loughran, Joshua Lerner, Jay R. Ritter, Belén Villalonga and Mara Faccio.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.